HENSLEY
v.
PALMER
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court dismissed an appeal from an order retransferring a case from law to equity, holding that the order was not a final judgment and the appeal statute did not grant jurisdiction for review of non-final law court orders.
No, Florida Statutes Section 59.45 does not confer jurisdiction to review any non-final order from a law court; it only saves an appeal if the underlying facts warrant the extraordinary writ of certiorari.
“Except as specified by statute, appeals at law lie only from final judgments.”
Establishes the general rule for appeals from law courts.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe appellee initiated a mechanic's lien foreclosure suit in equity. The case was transferred to the law side of the court upon the appellant's motion…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Common Law Writ Of Certiorari cases and more on FLexlaw
ROBERTS, Justice.
We here consider a motion to dismiss an appeal taken from an order entered in proceedings instituted in the court below by the appellee to foreclose in equity a mechanic's and materialman's lien.
The cause was transferred to the law side of the court upon appellant's motion to dismiss and was thereafter re-transferred to equity upon motion of the appellee.
It is the order retransferring the cause to equity which is the subject of this appeal, the dismissal of which has been moved by appellee.
Except as specified by statute, appeals at law lie only from final judgments.
Section 59.02(1), Florida Statutes, F.S.A. "A judgment is `final' for the purposes of an appeal when it terminates a litigation between the parties on the merits of the case and leaves nothing to be done but to enforce by execution what has been determined." *852 Hillsboro Plantation, Inc., v. Plunkett, Fla., 55 So. 2d 534, 536.
Manifestly, the order sought to be reviewed even assuming such an order to be authorized under our practice does not meet this test.
The appellant argues, however, that even if the order is not a "final judgment," this court may treat the appeal as a petition for certiorari and proceed to a review of the order under the provisions of Section 59.45, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., that "If an appeal be improvidently taken where the remedy might have been more properly sought by certiorari, this alone shall not be a ground for dismissal; but the notice of appeal and the record thereon shall be regarded and acted on as a petition for certiorari duly presented to the supreme court."
This contention might have merit if we were here concerned with an "appeal" from an interlocutory order in chancery, since this court is expressly authorized to review such orders by Section 59.02(3), Florida Statutes, F.S.A.; and Section 59.45, supra, has its principal application in relieving an attorney of the burden of deciding whether a chancery order which he wishes to have reviewed by this court is final or interlocutory, and thus whether he must proceed by way of an appeal or by way of "proceedings in the nature of certiorari" under Section 59.02(3) and 30 F.S.A. Rule 34 of the Supreme Court Rules.
But we do not understand that the provisions of Section 59.45 may be invoked to confer upon this court jurisdiction to review orders and judgments of the law courts of this state in any and all cases where an appeal will not lie, and we do not think that the Legislature so intended.
In those cases where the showing made on the "appeal" is sufficient to invoke this court's organic power to issue the common-law writ of certiorari to review proceedings at law below, then the provisions of Section 59.45, supra, will save the "appeal."
But in the absence of such a showing, the statute is ineffective to do so.
No such case has been here made.
Accordingly, the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.
It is so ordered.
SEBRING, C.J., MATHEWS, J., and TAYLOR, Associate Justice, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Neville A. Chan v. Brunswick Corp., 388 So. 2d 274 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980)…te termination of the cause between the parties directly affected except enforcement by execution or otherwise, the judgment may be said to be final. Hotel Roosevelt Co. v. City of Jacksonville, 192 So. 2d 334 (Fla. 1st DCA 1966); Hensley v. Palmer, 59 So. 2d 851 (Fla.1952). More specifically, where successive judgments are entered and the later judgment represents neither a material change of the earlier judgment nor a new exercise of discretion, the time for appeal is counted from the earlier judgment. Dru…
-
The Travelers Indem. Co. v. Walker, 401 So. 2d 1147 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)…ate Review § 51, n. 89 (1978). This is plainly true of the “Order Enforcing Settlement.” There was nothing whatever left for the court to do in the pending action, other than to enforce what the order required of the parties. See, Hensley v. Palmer, 59 So. 2d 851 (Fla.1952); 3 Fla.Jur.2d, supra, n. 90. The plaintiff’s contention that a subsequent formal order of dismissal was necessary to terminate the action is untenable. By the terms of Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.420(a)(l)(ii), an action may be dismissed, specifically…
-
Sammons v. Sammons, 479 So. 2d 223 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)…dicial labor — apart from possible appropriate enforcement proceedings — was required after its entry, we reject the appellee’s suggestion that the order below was not in fact a "final judgment” within the scope of this principle. Hensley v. Palmer, 59 So. 2d 851 (Fla.1952); Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Walker, 401 So. 2d 1147 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). . While, even absent the jurisdictional defect, the judgment below could not be upheld as, in effect, an appropriate judgment for partition because neither the compl…
Previewing 3 of 10 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Hillsboro Plantation v. Plunkett, 55 So.2d 534 (Fla. 1951)
- Hensley v. Palmer, 59 So.2d 851 (Fla. 1952)