NICHOLS ENGINEERING & RESEARCH CORP.
v.
STATE EX REL. KNIGHT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Supreme Court of Florida affirmed a lower court's decision that permanently enjoined taxpayers from further suits challenging the City of Miami's construction of an incinerator. The court found the current suit to be a continuation of previous, unsuccessful litigation on the same issues.
No, the trial court did not err. The current lawsuit presented no material difference in parties, issues, or purpose compared to two prior unsuccessful suits, and the city had taken all necessary steps to authorize construction.
“The point for determination is whether or not the decree so entered was free from error.”
Identifies the central legal question on appeal.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThis was the third taxpayer class suit seeking to enjoin the City of Miami from constructing an incinerator. The city moved to dismiss, filed an answe…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Governmental Function cases and more on FLexlaw
TERRELL, Justice.
For the third time we are confronted with a taxpayers class suit to enjoin the construction of an incinerator by the City of Miami.
See, State ex rel.
Knight v. City of Miami, Fla., 53 So. 2d 636, first appearance.
Opinion second appearance, Hinds v. State ex rel.
Knight, Fla., 59 So. 2d 634.
The instant suit was brought February 29, 1952.
The City of Miami seasonably moved to dismiss the complaint and on same date filed its answer and counterclaim, the latter praying that plaintiffs be enjoined from instituting further suits of the like character. Plaintiffs having failed to answer or defend the counterclaim a default and decree pro confesso were entered against them.
The City of Miami moved for summary judgment under the rule.
On petition of Nichols Engineering & Research Corporation it was permitted to intervene and file an answer. Evidence was taken, the motion for summary judgment was granted and the bill of complaint was dismissed with prejudice.
The decree pro confesso was approved and the plaintiffs and those in like situation were perpetually restrained from instituting any *875 other suit for the purpose of challenging the right of the City of Miami to construct an incinerator on the land designated for that purpose.
The present appeal is from this decree.
The point for determination is whether or not the decree so entered was free from error. We think this question requires an affirmative answer. It is shown that appellant was the successful bidder to construct the incinerator and that it was awarded the contract subject to sale of the certificates validated by this Court in State v. City of Miami, Fla., 55 So. 2d 715.
It is essential that this and any other question as to right to proceed with the construction be removed.
It is further revealed from the record that there is no material difference in the parties, the issues involved and the purpose of this suit and the other two suits referred to in the forepart of this opinion.
The record further shows that the City Commission and the Planning Board have taken all steps necessary and performed all prerequisites required by Section 72 and other provisions of the City Charter essential to construction of the incinerator. The plans and specifications call for its construction on the lot designated.
Chapter 27728, Special Acts of 1951, authorizes its construction by the city and designates it a governmental function.
The only objection raised by appellees is that the property on which the incinerator is to be located has not been adequately zoned for that purpose.
In our view the steps taken by the city, including Chapter 27728, completely overcome any objection raised by appellees.
Since the parties here are the same as those in the other two suits, and they are seeking the same relief based on the same ground, they are estopped to further prosecute the cause.
The decree appealed from is therefore affirmed.
Affirmed.
SEBRING, C.J., and HOBSON and MATHEWS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
A1A Mobile Home Park, Inc. v. Brevard Cnty., 246 So. 2d 126 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971)…n the contentions of the defendant with respect to the proposition that the construction and operation of a sewage disposal system is governmental, as distinguished from a proprietary, function. See Nichols Engr. & Research Corp. v. State, Fla.1952, 59 So. 2d 874; Register v. H. Burton Elliott, Inc., Del.1967, 229 A. 2d 488; Nehrbas v. Incorporated Village of Lloyd Harbor, 1957, 2 N.Y.2d 190, 159 N.Y.S.2d 145, 140 N.E. 2d 241; Kedroff v. Town of Springfield, Vt.1969, 256 A. 2d 457; Pruett v. Dayton, 1961, 39…
-
City OF Temple Terrace v. Hillsborough Ass'n FOR Retarded Citizens, Inc., 322 So. 2d 571 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975)…to municipal zoning in the same manner as private property owners. On the other hand, the Supreme Court seemed to suggest the application of a governmental-proprietary test in Nichols Engineering & Research Corp. v. State ex rel. Knight, Fla.1952, 59 So. 2d 874. This case held that the construction of an incinerator by the City of Miami, which had been authorized and designated a governmental function by statute, was not objectionable on the ground that the property on which it was to be situated had not b…
-
Metro. Dade Cnty. v. Parkway Towers Condo. Ass'n, 281 So. 2d 68 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973)…al facility wherever the Board of County Commissioners [the legislative body] may so direct. The County cites us to authorities, such as State v. DuBose, 99 Fla. 812, 128 So. 4; Nichols Engineering & Research Corp. v. State ex rel. Knight, Fla.1952, 59 So. 2d 874; City of Treasure Island v. Decker, Fla.App.1965, 174 So. 2d 756; A1A Mobile Home Park, Inc. v. Brevard County, Fla.App.1971, 246 So. 2d 126; Jefferson National Bank of Miami Beach v. City of Miami Beach, Fla.App.1972, 267 So. 2d 100; Volume 2, Amer…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Nichols Eng'g & Research Corp. v. State Ex Rel. Knight, 59 So. 2d 874 (Fla. 1952)