ROUNDTREE
v.
STATE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court affirmed a conviction for assault with intent to commit rape, holding that the defendant's cessation of the assault due to emission was not a voluntary desistance as required to avoid conviction.
No, an abandonment caused by emission is not a voluntary desistance because it stems from a failure of incentive rather than a conscious decision to recant.
“Nothing will be accomplished by detailing further the circumstances of the despicable affair except to point out his desistance before he consummated the act and his reason for doing so.”
Introduces the specific factual detail that the defendant desisted from the assault.
Previewing 1 of 4 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe appellant, a caddie, attacked a woman golfer, threatened her, and placed his body on hers. He desisted before intercourse only because he had an e…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Assault With Intent To Commit Rape cases and more on FLexlaw
The testimony forming the basis for the judgment of guilty of assault with intent to commit rape indisputably showed that the appellant, a caddie, attacked the prosecuting witness, a woman golfer, in a secluded place near a golf course, threw her to the ground, threatened to kill her if she screamed, and placed his body on hers. In fact, he offered no testimony whatever to refute that which unquestionably established conduct constituting an assault with intent to have sexual intercourse with his victim.
Nothing will be accomplished by detailing further the circumstances of the despicable affair except to point out his desistance before he consummated the act and his reason for doing so.
He now relies upon the rule announced in Rye v. State, 153 Fla. 559, 15 So. 2d 255, that a conviction of the offense will not be upheld if it appears that the defendant "voluntarily desisted before the consummation, without any outside interference and with no unusual resistance" on the part of his prey. Here the assailant abandoned his purpose before intercourse was effected, but only because, meanwhile, he had had an emission.
This presents the question whether one who abandons such an effort because of emission can be said to have "voluntarily desisted." It seems to this writer that such a conclusion does not logically follow, because the reason for the rule is that voluntary abandonment of the nefarious purpose indicates an intention to recant, while emission of seed during the attempt is more a failure of incentive to proceed than a wilful retreat.
It has been said that an offender, "so long as he is capable of arresting an evil plan, should be encouraged to do so, by saving him harmless in case of such retreat before it is possible for any evil consequences to ensue. * * * To punish him after retreat and abandonment would be to destroy the motive for retreat and abandonment." Wharton's Criminal Law, 12th Ed., Vol. 1, Sec. 226.
This appellant is not to be credited with any high motive in turning back, entitling him now to refuge in the principle we have quoted. Nature simply robbed him of his urge to go forward; whereupon he quitted his vile assault involuntarily, we think, rather than voluntarily through the exercise of any will power on his part. *Page 13
He was justly convicted, and the judgment is —
Affirmed.
ADAMS, C.J., and TERRELL and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Tooley v. State, 675 So. 2d 984 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996)…oley beat the female victim into unconsciousness and then decided not to rape her after having kidnapped her, tied her and threatened her with a gun. Those acts were all done with the announced and obvious intent to rape her. See Roundtree v. State, 43 So. 2d 12 (Fla.1949) (appellant properly convicted of assault with intent to commit rape even though he abandoned his purpose before intercourse was effected where he attacked woman golfer in secluded place, threw her to ground, threatened to kill her if she…
-
Denis St. Giorge v. State, 92 So. 2d 612 (Fla. 1956)…ecutrix, established the intent he had in his mind when he grappled with her. It is also argued in appellant’s behalf that he desisted without “ouside interference and with no unusual resistance by the female.” The case of Roundtree v. State, Fla., 43 So. 2d 12, is cited in support of the principle that an offender capable of abandoning an evil plan should be encouraged by the knowledge that he will be relieved of responsibility if he desists before “ ‘any evil consequences * * * ensue.’ ” But in that case…
-
Gilchrist v. State, 177 So. 2d 777 (Fla. 1st DCA 1965)…own to constitute an abuse of discretion. ’ The judgment appealed is accordingly affirmed. : ■ ; CARROLL; DONALD K., J., and TAYLOR, HUGH M., Associate Judge, concur. . Dannelley v. State, 80 Fla. 773, 87 So. 44. . Roundtree v. State (Fla.1949), 43 So. 2d 12. . St. Giorge v. State (Fla.1956), 92 So. 2d 612.…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Rye v. State, 153 Fla. 559 (Fla. 1943)