HUSHTINE BRACEWELL
v.
ZF MARINE PROPULSION SYSTEMS MIRAMAR, LLC

Fla. 4th DCA | 2026-04-01
No. 2025-2098
2026 FL 3678 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2026) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The trial court's judgment was affirmed based on applicable precedent governing the claims at issue.


Facts & Procedural History

Hushtine Bracewell filed an action against ZF Marine Propulsion Systems Miramar, LLC in the Circuit Court for Broward County. The case was decided by …

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Opinion of the Court

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

HUSHTINE BRACEWELL, Appellant,

V.

ZF MARINE PROPULSION SYSTEMS MIRAMAR, LLC, Appellee.

No. 4D2025-2098

[April 1, 2026]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Martin J. Bidwill, Judge; L.T. Case No. 062024CA007145AXXXCE.

Jason S. Remer of Remer, Georges-Pierre & Hoogerwoerd, PLLC, Coral Gables, for appellant.

Richard A. Beauchamp and Benjamin P. Bean of Panza, Maurer & Maynard, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Aleu v. Nova Southeastern Univ., Inc., 357 So. 3d 134 (Fla. 4th DCA 2023).

LEVINE, FORST and SHEPHERD, JJ., concur. * * *

Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …of Remer, Georges-Pierre & Hoogerwoerd, PLLC, Coral Gables, for appellant. Richard A. Beauchamp and Benjamin P. Bean of Panza, Maurer & Maynard, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Aleu v. Nova Southeastern Univ., Inc., 357 So. 3d 134 (Fla. 4th DCA 2023). LEVINE, FORST and SHEPHERD, JJ., concur. * * * Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.…
  • …re thus timely. B. Oakley's Contrary Arguments Do Not Persuade Oakley offers several bases for concluding that Williams's claims are untimely. None are persuasive. 7 ---PAGE 7--- Oakley mainly relies on Aleu v. Nova Southeastern University, Inc., 357 So. 3d 134 (Fla. 4th DCA 2023). See MSJ at 4–11; Reply at 2-5. In Aleu, the court concluded that an EEOC right-to-sue notice qualified as a “fail[ure] to conciliate or determine whether there is reasonable cause” under 760.11(8) and triggered both the right to…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw