DALE ANTHONY MUSICO, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• T.T. v. Enoc Esteves, 828 So. 2d 449 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)
  …imes charged are encompassed by section 985.215(5)(g), but petitioner contends that the state did not establish good cause, i.e., “that the nature of the charge requires additional time for prosecution or defense of the case.” Id. In B.G. v. Fryer, 570 So. 2d 430 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990), one of the petitioners was [*451] being held for more than twenty-one days on various grounds, one of which was that the state was considering prosecuting him as an adult. We concluded that this was not a sufficient ground and a…
• E.D. v. State, 966 So. 2d 994 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007)
  …J.B. v. Lumpee, 450 So. 2d 1286 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984), the district court held that a finding of good cause must be predicated on a record containing competent evidence of the reasons for continuing the detention period. In B.G., C.W. & B.O. v. Fryer, 570 So. 2d 430 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990), the district court held that even though the trial court had granted a motion for continued detention for good cause, the order was granted pursuant to a conclusory motion without competent evidence to support its conclusory cla…
• T.B. v. Wright, 679 So. 2d 82 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)
  …held that the cause requirement of the statute “does not relate to the original basis for detention, but to the reason for the delay in the commencement of the adjudicatory hearing process.” We [*83] agreed with the First District in B.G. v. Fryer, 570 So. 2d 430 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990), and P.H. v. Fryer, 570 So. 2d 1096 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). The reasons for continuing the detention of petitioner given by the trial court do not have anything to do with the required showing of cause under the statute but, as in…

Authorities Cited

• Murray v. State, 491 So. 2d 1120 (Fla. 1986)
• Cleo Douglas LeCROY v. State, 533 So. 2d 750 (Fla. 1988)