THOMAS NOBLE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
THOMAS NOBLE, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
570 So. 2d 1133
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1990)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the judgment and sentence, but reverse the imposition of a public defender’s fee and statutory costs and remand. Appellant was not provided notice as required by Thomas v. State, 486 So. 2d 69 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986), and Mays v. State, 519 So. 2d 618 (Fla.1988).
HERSEY, C.J., and DOWNEY and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Alexander v. State, 575 So. 2d 1370 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991)…to make the record show that all requirements of due process, including the opportunity to be heard on the instruction to be given, have been met. This “blue card” statement will not suffice to meet that important responsibility. Westlund v. State, 570 So. 2d 1133 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990), is not controlling here because, in Westlund, the record shows counsel was present and simply failed to object to the court’s action. Accordingly, the judgment of conviction and sentence appealed from are reversed and the cause…
-
Jones v. State, 681 So. 2d 913 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)…PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Westlund v. State, 570 So. 2d 1133 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). WARNER, PARIENTE and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.…
-
Garcia v. State, 598 So. 2d 1082 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992)…PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Westlund v. State, 570 So. 2d 1133 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). ANSTEAD, WARNER and FARMER, JJ., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- Mays v. State, 519 So. 2d 618 (Fla. 1988)
- Thomas v. State, 486 So. 2d 69 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986)