MIAMI PAN AMERICAN REALTY, INC., APPELLANT,
v.
COLEEN G. WERNER, ROBERTO MARTIN, NITRAM INVESTMENT, INC., THE LAND GROUP REALTY, INC., TONY PEREZ, AND THE ASCOT GROUP, INC., APPELLEES
MIAMI PAN AMERICAN REALTY, INC., APPELLANT,
COLEEN G. WERNER, ROBERTO MARTIN, NITRAM INVESTMENT, INC., THE LAND GROUP REALTY, INC., TONY PEREZ, AND THE ASCOT GROUP, INC., APPELLEES
574 So. 2d 1157
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1991)
Caution
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Richland Grove & Cattle Co., Inc. v. Easterling, 526 So. 2d 685 (Fla.1988); Holl v. Talcott, 191 So. 2d 40 (Fla.1966).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Dep't OF Revenue v. Cessford, 100 So. 3d 1199 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012)…fees can be awarded against the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services filing a paternity suit on behalf of the mother if “there is a proper finding of a complete absence of a justiciable issue of either law or fact”);2 Collins v. Brodzki, 574 So. 2d 1157, 1158 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991) (“Under the proper circumstances fees may be awarded to a successful respondent in the paternity action pursuant to section 57.105 ... if the [*1205] proper predicate is made and the amount is reasonable.”). Despite the fac…
-
Fla. Dep't OF Revenue v. Hannah, 745 So. 2d 1055 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)…events a grandmother would likely know. In filing its suit, it was not unreasonable under the circumstances of this case for [*1057] the Department to rely on the statement of the grandmother.* Reversed. * This case is unlike Collins v. Brodzki, 574 So. 2d 1157 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991), where in a paternity suit there was evidence available to the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services (which the Department apparently refused to examine) that the mother had conceded that the respondent was not the fath…
Authorities Cited
- Gory Roofing Tile Mfg., Inc. v. Davison, 191 So. 2d 40 (Fla. 1966)
- Richland Grove & Cattle Co., Inc. v. Easterling, 526 So. 2d 685 (Fla. 1988)