ROBERT TAYLOR AND TRANS FLOR LIGHTING CORP., APPELLANTS,
v.
CITY NATIONAL BANK, APPELLEE
ROBERT TAYLOR AND TRANS FLOR LIGHTING CORP., APPELLANTS,
CITY NATIONAL BANK, APPELLEE
575 So. 2d 730
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1991)
Caution
Cited by 15 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm based upon a holding that there exists no genuine issue of material fact and that the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Holl v. Talcott, 191 So. 2d 40 (Fla.1966); Moore v. Moms, 475 So. 2d 666 (Fla.1985); § 695.01, Fla.Stat. (1989).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Keays v. The State OF Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, 592 So. 2d 1255 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992)…to the new sheriff. The court rightly found that it was her duty to preserve her right to reemployment. It is noteworthy that both Nofrio and Flagler County involved long absences of several months’ duration. Garcia v. AT & T Communications, Inc., 575 So. 2d 730 (Fla.1991), involved a similarly long leave. In Garcia the claimant was denied unemployment benefits because she had been informed prior to taking her six-month leave that a job might not be available for her upon her return. The critical point, as…
-
Sanford Meyers v. Quality Extruded Prods., Inc., 611 So. 2d 54 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992)…sition would be available upon his return. This is not a case where upon a request for a leave of absence an employer specifically notifies its employee that the employee’s reinstatement is not guaranteed. See Garcia v. AT & T Communications, Inc., 575 So. 2d 730 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991) (employee, who requested leave of absence for six months and was informed that her reemployment was contingent upon position being available, was not entitled to unemployment benefits). In this case, Meyers and the president agree…
-
Vajda v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, 610 So. 2d 645 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992)…employed, she takes an unsuitable job and after a few days cannot continue the employment. Id. at 609 (footnotes omitted; emphasis added). The Commission contends that its ruling in this case was mandated by Garcia v. AT & T Communications, Inc., 575 So. 2d 730 (Fla. 3d DCA1991). Garcia has no bearing on this case. Both Garcia and the case discussed therein, Williams v. Florida Indus. Comm’n, 135 So. 2d 435 (Fla. 3d DCA1961), involved situations in which an employee left his or her job for reasons other th…
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Gory Roofing Tile Mfg., Inc. v. Davison, 191 So. 2d 40 (Fla. 1966)
- Moore v. Morris, 475 So. 2d 666 (Fla. 1985)