LARRY GLENN JERNIGAN, APPELLANT,
v.
TERESA ANN JERNIGAN, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that a wife's mortgage payments from marital earnings do not automatically entitle her to a special equity in the marital home.
[1] A spouse's contribution of marital earnings to pay for property, where the other spouse's marital earnings are expended for other purposes, does not constitute a special…
[2] A special equity is a vested interest acquired by a spouse due to contributions of funds, property, or services beyond normal marital duties.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceDuring a marriage, the wife made payments on a second mortgage of the marital home using funds earned during the marriage. The trial court awarded the…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Marital Assets cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
This cause is before us on appeal from a dissolution of marriage in which the trial court awarded a special equity in the marital residence. Appellant raises one issue which requires reversal.
The parties were married on November 8, 1986. After several years of marriage, Mrs. Jernigan filed for dissolution of marriage and claimed a special equity in the marital home. Mr. Jernigan counter-petitioned for special equity, claiming that the marital home was purchased prior to the marriage.1
During the marriage, a second mortgage was obtained on the marital home. It was the understanding of the parties that Mr. Jernigan would be responsible for the first mortgage and Mrs. Jernigan for the second mortgage.2 After hearing, the trial court awarded a special equity in the marital home in the amount of $4,699 in favor of Mrs. Jernigan.
A special equity “is a vested interest which a spouse acquires because of contribution of funds, property, or services made over and above the performance of normal marital duties.” Duncan v. Duncan, 379 So. 2d 949 (Fla.1980). Where, as here, both parties work and the wife’s earnings3 are used to pay for property while the husband’s earnings are expended for some other purpose, the wife’s contribution cannot be deemed unconnected with normal marital duties so as to entitle her to a special equity. Fiedler v. Fiedler, 375 So. 2d 1119 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979), certiorari denied, 383 So. 2d 1193 (Fla.1980).
Accordingly, we reverse the award of a special equity and remand for further proceedings so that the trial court may impose such remedies as may be necessary to equitably distribute the marital assets.
BOOTH, ZEHMER and WOLF, JJ., concur. . The parties agree that the marital home was purchased subject to a mortgage by Mr. Jerni-gan prior to the marriage.
. Mrs. Jernigan made 36 payments of $144 each with regard to the second mortgage.
.All funds used to make mortgage payments were from wages earned during the marriage. There is no evidence that the expended funds came from a source unconnected with the marital relationship.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Stefanowitz v. Stefanowitz, 586 So. 2d 460 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991)…equity.” Griffiths v. Grif [*462] fiths, 563 So. 2d 773, 775 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). However, the $20,600 mortgage was paid from wages earned during the marriage and must be deemed a marital asset subject to equitable distribution. Jernigan v. Jernigan, 579 So. 2d 858 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). Therefore, the order must be remanded for recalculation of the special equity and equitable distribution awards.3 II.MARITAL ASSETS Mr. Stefanowitz received several shares of Boeing stock as a gift prior to the marriage. The i…
Authorities Cited
- Duncan v. Duncan, 379 So. 2d 949 (Fla. 1980)
- Chiappa v. State, 375 So. 2d 1119 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979)