MARILIN LARKEN AND MARCELO LARKEN, APPELLANTS,
v.
BARNETT BANK OF SOUTH FLORIDA, N.A., ETC., APPELLEE
MARILIN LARKEN AND MARCELO LARKEN, APPELLANTS,
BARNETT BANK OF SOUTH FLORIDA, N.A., ETC., APPELLEE
579 So. 2d 891
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1991)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The Larkens appeal from a final summary judgment in an action for default on a promissory note.
We affirm the order of final summary judgment. See Holl v. Talcott, 191 So. 2d 40 (Fla.1966). However, we reverse that portion of the order awarding attorneys’ fees to the appellee and remand to the trial court with directions to comply with the requirements of Florida Patient’s Compensation Fund v. Rowe, 472 So. 2d 1145 (Fla.1985).
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with directions.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Furney v. Furney, 659 So. 2d 364 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995)…appellant carried this burden, and we remand for the trial court’s redetermination based upon application of the appropriate legal standard. We certify conflict regarding our determination of the burden of proof with Santiesteban v. Santiesteban, 579 So. 2d 891 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991). AFFIRMED in part and REVERSED in part. ERVIN, MINER and BENTON, JJ., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- Gory Roofing Tile Mfg., Inc. v. Davison, 191 So. 2d 40 (Fla. 1966)
- Fla. Patient's Comp. Fund v. Rowe, 472 So. 2d 1145 (Fla. 1985)