IN THE INTEREST OF B.M., A CHILD

Fla. 4th DCA | 1991-06-19
No. 90-1041
ANSTEAD, POLEN and GARRETT, JJ., concur.
580 So. 2d 896 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1991) Positive Treatment
Cited by 10 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We construe the provision in the trial court’s disposition order concerning restitution as one retaining jurisdiction to determine the amount of restitution at a properly noticed hearing after appellant’s release from detention, and we affirm the order. See A.P. v. State, 558 So. 2d 519 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990).

ANSTEAD, POLEN and GARRETT, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Gladfelter v. State, 604 So. 2d 929 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992)
    …unt of restitution, even beyond sixty days from the sentence, is permissible. Savory v. State, 600 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992), approved in part, corrected on other grounds Savory v. State, 600 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992); In the Interest of B.M., 580 So. 2d 896 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); Stanley v. State, 580 So. 2d 349 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). We affirm as to this point, and to the extent we are in conflict with State v. Martin, 577 So. 2d 689 (Fla. 1st DCA), rev. denied, State v. Martin, 587 So. 2d 1329 (Fla.1991)…
  • Savory v. State, 600 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992)
    …gain, the facts are wrong. The original sentence did impose restitution and the court reserved jurisdiction to determine the amount at a later date. This is permissible. Hatcher v. State, 591 So. 2d 1134 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992); In the Interest of B.M., 580 So. 2d 896 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); Weckerle v. State, 579 So. 2d 742 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); McCaskill v. State, 520 So. 2d 664 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). Savory’s reliance on Jones v. State, 590 So. 2d 1061 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991), and Abt v. State, 581 So. 2d 1001 (Fla. 4th…
  • E.B. v. State, 724 So. 2d 140 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)
    …y after such a determination has been made by the trial court does the issue of the propriety of a restitution order become ripe for review. See § 39.054(1)(f), Fla. Stat. (1995); J.O.S. v. State, 689 So. 2d 1061 (Fla.1997); In the Interest of B.M., 580 So. 2d 896 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). As to appellant’s second issue on appeal, the state concedes, and we agree, that the trial court erred in failing to set a maximum period of commitment of one year for the battery offense and sixty days for the disorderly condu…

Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw