DEAN HARDAGE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
DEAN HARDAGE, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
581 So. 2d 965
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1991)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the defendant’s convictions and sentences for two counts of attempted murder of a law enforcement officer and two counts of robbery. Regarding the robbery sentences, however,-we strike the notations referring to section 775.0825, Florida Statutes (1987). Although that statute requires a defendant to serve no less than twenty-five years for attempted murder of a law enforcement officer, it does not apply to robbery. Eraeta v. State, 575 So. 2d 206 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). The notations do not otherwise affect the robbery sentences because they fall within the permitted range.
Affirmed.
HALL, A.C.J., and THREADGILL and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Wolfe v. State, 585 So. 2d 506 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991)…ed murder of a law enforcement officer and two counts of robbery. Regarding the robbery sentences, however, we strike the notation referring to section 775.0825, Florida Statutes (1987), as we did in Mr. Wolfe’s codefendant’s case, Hardage v. State, 581 So. 2d 965 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). Although section 775.0825 requires a defendant to serve no less than twenty-five years for attempted murder of a law enforcement officer, it does not apply to robbery. Eraeta v. State, 575 So. 2d 206 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). The nota…
Authorities Cited
- Eraeta v. State, 575 So. 2d 206 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991)