DARRELL EUGENE WOLFE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the defendant’s convictions and sentences for two counts of attempted murder of a law enforcement officer and two counts of robbery. Regarding the robbery sentences, however, we strike the notation referring to section 775.0825, Florida Statutes (1987), as we did in Mr. Wolfe’s codefendant’s case, Hardage v. State, 581 So. 2d 965 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). Although section 775.0825 requires a defendant to serve no less than twenty-five years for attempted murder of a law enforcement officer, it does not apply to robbery. Eraeta v. State, 575 So. 2d 206 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). The notation does not otherwise affect the robbery sentences, which are concurrent to the other sentences.
Affirmed.
SCHEB, A.C.J., and THREADGILL and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Vermon T. Donald v. State, 613 So. 2d 935 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993)…in accordance with the provisions of F.S. 775.084.” It is a settled rule of law that the written judgment and sentence must conform to the trial court’s oral pronouncement. Larry v. State, 590 So. 2d 1125 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Frederickson v. State, 585 So. 2d 506 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). Moreover, when a cause is remanded for resentenc-ing, the trial court is not authorized to impose a sentence that does not comport with the remand instructions. Larry v. State, 576 So. 2d 1346 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). The sentencin…
Authorities Cited
- Eraeta v. State, 575 So. 2d 206 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991)
- Hardage v. State, 581 So. 2d 965 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991)