JOSE REINALDO AIRA, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Statutory Costs cases and more on FLexlaw
PETERSON, Judge.
Jose Reinaldo Aira appeals the imposition of his sentence based upon a single scoresheet which shows that legal constraint points were calculated by multiplying 36 (the points to be awarded for commission of one offense while under legal restraint) times the two new offenses. We affirm on the authority of Walker v. State, 546 So. 2d 764 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989), and note conflict with Lewis v. State, 574 So. 2d 245 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991).
Aira also complains that a public defender’s fee and statutory costs were imposed upon him as a condition of probation without a special notice being given to him in addition to the statutory notice. Ordinarily, he would be entitled to notice and opportunity to be heard before a public defender’s fee is imposed pursuant to Bull v. State, 548 So. 2d 1103 (Fla.1989), but in this case, the record reflects that Aira stipulated to the value of the public defender’s services. As to the statutorily mandated and liquidated costs, no special notice was required before imposition. Beasley v. State, 580 So. 2d 139 (Fla.1991).
AFFIRMED.
GOSHORN, C.J., and DAUKSCH, J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Rocker v. State, 640 So. 2d 163 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994)…the court was required to determine his ability to pay the court costs before their imposition. However, the record reflects that the fees and costs were part of his plea agreement, and thus, notice and a hearing were unnecessary. See Aira v. State, 583 So. 2d 419 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991) (finding that it is proper to impose a public defender’s hen without notice or an opportunity to be heard where defendant stipulated to the amount of the fee), quashed on other grounds, 593 So. 2d 1049 (Fla.1992). As corrected,…
-
Aira v. State, 593 So. 2d 1049 (Fla. 1992)…PER CURIAM. We have for review Aira v. State, 583 So. 2d 419 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991), in which the Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court’s use of a multiplier in calculating legal constraint points. We have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution. In Flowers v…
Authorities Cited
- State v. Beasley, 580 So. 2d 139 (Fla. 1991)
- Bull v. State, 548 So. 2d 1103 (Fla. 1989)
- Walker v. State, 546 So. 2d 764 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989)
- Lewis v. State, 574 So. 2d 245 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991)