JOSE REINALDO AIRA, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
PER CURIAM.
We have for review Aira v. State, 583 So. 2d 419 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991), in which the Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court’s use of a multiplier in calculating legal constraint points. We have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution.
In Flowers v. State, 586 So. 2d 1058 (Fla.1991), we disapproved the use of a multiplier and held that legal constraint points are to be scored once on the sentencing guideline scoresheet.
Accordingly, we quash the decision below to the extent that it conflicts with our decision in Flowers, and remand this case for reconsideration.
It is so ordered.
SHAW, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, barkett, grimes, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Carter v. State, 786 So. 2d 1173 (Fla. 2001)…b]ecause Carter's sentences are currently under review by the Florida Supreme Court, we hold that Carter must wait until the court rules on the legality of his sentences in the earlier proceedings.” Carter II, 747 So. 2d at 484. Cf. State v. Walker, 593 So. 2d 1049 (Fla.1992) (dismissal of review proper where jurisdiction was improvidently granted because there was no express and direct conflict at the time the Court accepted jurisdiction). . The Legislature amended the habitual felony offender statute to app…
-
Lamont v. State, 610 So. 2d 435 (Fla. 1992)…258 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992) (life felonies not subject to enhanced sentencing under the habitual offender statute); McKinney v. State, 585 So. 2d 318 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991) (same); Walker v. State, 580 So. 2d 281 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991) (same) review dismissed, 593 So. 2d 1049 (Fla.1992); Power v. State, 568 So. 2d 511 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990) (same). The district court rejected the petitioners’ construction of the Act. The court reasoned that such a construction would defeat the legislative intent, as expressed in sections 7…
-
Bennie Lee Pearson v. State, 603 So. 2d 676 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992)…0); SECOND DISTRICT: Ledesma v. State, 528 So. 2d 470 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988); FOURTH DISTRICT: Newton v. State, 581 So. 2d 212 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991), approved, 594 So. 2d 306 (Fla.1992); Walker v. State, 580 So. 2d 281 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991), rev. dismissed, 593 So. 2d 1049 (Fla.1992); FIFTH DISTRICT: Power v. State, 568 So. 2d 511 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990).…
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Flowers v. State, 586 So. 2d 1058 (Fla. 1991)
- Aira v. State, 583 So. 2d 419 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991)