STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,

v.

MORICE PRESIDENT, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Pilieci v. State, 991 So. 2d 883 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008)
  …The reviewing court must determine whether the omitted facts, if added to the affidavit, would have defeated probable cause and whether the omission resulted from intentional or reckless police conduct that amounts to deception.”); State v. Panzino, 583 So. 2d 1059, 1062 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991) (“A fact constitutes a material omission if a substantial possibility exists that knowledge of the omission would have altered a reasonable magistrate’s probable cause determination. In determining whether a material omitte…
• Grim v. State, 971 So. 2d 85 (Fla. 2007)
  …was not erroneous, then Grim’s ineffective assistance of appellate counsel claim fails. Both a magistrate’s probable cause determination and a trial court’s ruling on a motion to suppress are accorded a presumption of correctness. State v. Panzino, 583 So. 2d 1059, 1062 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991). In his motion to suppress, Grim argued that officers omitted two facts from the search warrant affidavit that would have made a finding of probable cause impossible: (1) that two officers looked through Grim’s house brief…
• Leary v. State, 880 So. 2d 776 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004)
  …., and GRIFFIN, J., concur. . Section 790.23, Florida Statutes (2003). . See State v. Carr, 438 So. 2d 826, 828 (Fla. 1983); Hawk v. State, 848 So. 2d 475 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003). . See McNamara v. State, 357 So. 2d 410 (Fla. 1978); State v. Panzino, 583 So. 2d 1059 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991); Velez v. State, 554 So. 2d 545 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989). . See United States v. Baker, 221 F. 3d 438 (3d Cir.2000); United States v. Blaze, 143 F. 3d 585, 591 n. 8 (10th Cir.1998); United States v. Wright, 932 F. 2d 868 (10th Cir.19…

Authorities Cited

• State v. LEE, 583 So. 2d 1055 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991)