THE FLORIDA BAR, COMPLAINANT,
v.
JOHN MONTGOMERY GREENE, RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court disbarred attorney John Montgomery Greene for practicing law while under suspension, finding that his long history of disciplinary violations and complete disregard for lesser sanctions warranted permanent removal from the profession.
Disbarment is the appropriate discipline. The Court rejected the referee's recommendation of extended suspension and a fine, finding that further suspension would be fruitless given Greene's persistent misconduct and refusal to comply with prior sanctions.
[1] Engaging in the practice of law while under suspension constitutes a disciplinary violation, regardless of whether a fee is charged or the services are performed for frie…
[2] A referee's recommendation for a fine as a condition of discipline is improper if there is no statutory or rule-based authority for imposing such a fine.
Previewing 2 of 5 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“The fact that Greene did not charge a fee for his services and was a personal friend of those for whom he performed the services does not make a difference.”
Establishes that lack of fee-charging does not excuse unauthorized practice of law
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceGreene engaged in the practice of law on four occasions while under suspension. He did not charge fees for his services and performed them for persona…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Petition For Rule To Show Cause cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
This disciplinary matter is before the Court upon the report and recommendation of the referee. We have jurisdiction according to article V, section 15, Florida Constitution.
The Florida Bar filed a petition for rule to show cause, alleging that respondent Greene engaged in the practice of law while under suspension. We entered an order to show cause and the appointed referee held an evidentiary hearing. The referee found that Greene engaged in the practice of law on four occasions while he was under suspension. He recommended that Greene be found in contempt of court, that his current suspension be extended for two years, and that he pay a fine of $2,500. Greene did not appear for or participate in the hearing.
We accept the referee’s findings that Greene engaged in the practice of law while under suspension. The fact that Greene did not charge a fee for his services and was a personal friend of those for whom he performed the services does not make a difference. The Fla. Bar v. Keehley, 190 So. 2d 173 (Fla.1966) (nonattorney who prepared company charters and other documents engaged in unauthorized practice of law even though he performed the services for family and friends and did not charge a fee).
However, we reject the referee’s recommendation as to the appropriate discipline. First, the Bar admits that there is no authority to impose a fine as a condition of discipline. Thus, the referee erred in recommending that Greene pay a $2,500 fine.
We agree with the Bar that further suspension of Greene would be fruitless. Greene has a long history of disciplinary violations. See The Fla. Bar v. Greene, 557 So. 2d 35 (Fla.1990); The Fla. Bar v. Greene, 529 So. 2d 1103 (Fla.1988); The Fla. Bar v. Greene, 515 So. 2d 1280 (Fla.1987); The Fla. Bar v. Greene, 485 So. 2d 1279 (Fla.1986); The Fla. Bar v. Greene, 463 So. 2d 213 (Fla.1985); The Fla. Bar v. Greene, 235 So. 2d 7 (Fla.1970). He has completely disregarded lesser forms of discipline imposed by this Court. He has failed to abide by conditions of probation. He has continued to practice law despite his suspension. We have found disbarment appropriate in other cases in which attorneys have engaged in the practice of law while suspended. See The Fla. Bar v. Jones, 571 So. 2d 426 (Fla.1990) (attorney disbarred for continuing to practice law during suspension, failing to comply with rules requiring him to inform clients of his suspended status, and misrepresenting to Court that he had complied with the suspension order); The Fla. Bar v. Bauman, 558 So. 2d 994 (Fla.1990) (attorney disbarred despite referee’s recommendation of suspension where attorney engaged in at least five acts of practicing law while under suspension). Given Greene’s past disciplinary violations, his refusal to adhere to lesser forms of discipline, and his failure to participate in this case,1 we find that disbarment is warranted.
Accordingly, respondent is hereby disbarred from the practice of law effective upon the filing date of this opinion and is enjoined from the practice of law. Judgment for costs in the amount of $984.87 is hereby assessed against the respondent, for which sum let execution issue.
It is so ordered.
SHAW, C.J. and BARKETT, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur. McDONALD, J., concurs in part and dissents in part with an opinion, in which OVERTON, J., concurs.
. Greene’s only participation in these proceedings has been his response to the show cause order that he had no objection to the appointment of a referee and his subsequent letter to the Court indicating that he wished to resign from The Florida Bar. He has failed to take the appropriate steps to resign. See R.Reg.Fla.Bar 3-7.12.
McDONALD, Judge,
concurring in part, dissenting in part.
I agree that the actions of Greene constituted the practice of law while suspended. Considering their nature, however, I would approve the referee’s recommendation of extending the suspension rather than imposing the ultimate penalty of disbarment.
OVERTON, J., concurs.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (11 total)
-
THE Florida BAR v. Frederick, 756 So. 2d 79 (Fla. 2000)…ecommended payment into 'the Fund suggests that he intended the payment not as restitution, but as something more -akin to a fine. Significantly, however, “there is no authority to impose a fine as a condition of discipline.” Florida Bar v. Greene, 589 So. 2d 281, 282 (Fla.1991); see also R. Regulating Fla. Bar 3-5.1 (types of discipline authorized do not include imposition of fine). Furthermore, in Florida Bar v. Rogowski 399 So. 2d 1390, 1391 (Fla.1981), this Court rejected a referee’s recommendation that…
-
THE Florida BAR v. Shoureas, 913 So. 2d 554 (Fla. 2005)…in a contempt case); Fla. Bar v. McAtee, 674 So. 2d 734 (Fla.1996) (same). . See, e.g., Fla. Bar v. Weisser, 721 So. 2d 1142 (Fla.1998); Fla. Bar v. Neely, 675 So. 2d 592 (Fla.1996); Fla. Bar v. Brown, 635 So. 2d 13 (Fla.1994); Fla. Bar v. Greene, 589 So. 2d 281 (Fla.1991); Fla. Bar v. Bauman, 558 So. 2d 994 (Fla.1990); Fla. Bar v. Winter, 549 So. 2d 188 (Fla.1989). . The cases cited by the Bar to support disbarment are all distinguishable. See Fla. Bar v. Rood, 678 So. 2d 1277, 1278 (Fla.1996) (disbarring…1 / 2
-
THE Florida BAR v. Forrester, 916 So. 2d 647 (Fla. 2005)…y disbarred attorney for continuing to practice law after he was disbarred); Fla. Bar v. Brown, 635 So. 2d 13 (Fla.1994) (holding in contempt and disbarring attorney for continuing to practice law after disciplinary resignation); Fla. Bar v. Greene, 589 So. 2d 281 (Fla.1991) (disbarring attorney for continuing to practice law while suspended); Fla. Bar v. Bauman, 558 So. 2d 994 (Fla.1990) (disbarring attorney for continuing to practice law while suspended); Fla. Bar v. Winter, 549 So. 2d 188 (Fla.1989) (perma…
Previewing 3 of 11 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- THE Florida BAR v. Greene, 485 So. 2d 1279 (Fla. 1986)
- THE Florida BAR v. Hiram Lee Bauman, 558 So. 2d 994 (Fla. 1990)
- State v. Watts, 558 So. 2d 994 (Fla. 1990)
- THE Florida BAR v. Keehley, 190 So. 2d 173 (Fla. 1966)
- THE Florida BAR v. Jones, 571 So. 2d 426 (Fla. 1990)
- THE Florida BAR v. Greene, 463 So. 2d 213 (Fla. 1985)
- THE Florida BAR v. Greene, 235 So. 2d 7 (Fla. 1970)
- THE Florida BAR v. Greene, 515 So. 2d 1280 (Fla. 1987)
- THE Florida BAR v. Greene, 529 So. 2d 1103 (Fla. 1988)