JOSEPH G. CASTRANOVA, ET UX., APPELLANTS,
v.
RONALD E. AUTH, ET AL., APPELLEES

Fla. 5th DCA | 1991-11-29
No. 91-48
GOSHORN, C.J., and SHARP, W., J., concur.
590 So. 2d 28 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1991) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases


Opinion of the Court
DAUKSCH, Judge.

[*29] DAUKSCH, Judge.

We affirm the judgment in this case in all respects except the award of attorney’s fees. That award was not properly done in accordance with Florida Patients Compensation Fund v. Rowe, 472 So. 2d 1145 (Fla.1985). The trial judge heard from two lawyers who gave opinions as to their estimate of the value of the attorney’s services and the judge entered an order making an award higher than the lowest and lower than the highest. That’s the way it was done in the old days. Now it must be done in accordance with Rowe, by having a complete evidentiary hearing and entering an order with specific findings. See also City of Orlando v. Kensington Ltd., 580 So. 2d 830 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991); Old Southern Life Ins. Co. v. Kirby, 563 So. 2d 706 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); Devex v. Liberty Federal Savings & Loan Assoc., 551 So. 2d 606 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989); Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Duffy’s Uttle Tavern, 541 So. 2d 689 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989).

The judgment is affirmed; the order awarding attorney’s fees is vacated and this cause remanded for a rehearing and proper order. REVERSED and REMANDED.

GOSHORN, C.J., and SHARP, W., J., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • United Auto. Ins. Co. v. Prof'l Med. Grp., Inc., 46 Fla. L. Weekly D1102 (Fla. 3d DCA 2021)
    …o. 3d 661, 662 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013); Guyton v. Leonard Dewey Wilkinson Action Welding Supply, Inc., 707 So. 2d 885, 886 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); Roggemann v. Boston Safe Deposit & Tr. Co., 670 So. 2d 1073, 1075 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Castranova v. Auth, 590 So. 2d 28, 29 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991). Reversed and remanded.…
  • Ragar v. Diona Bruno Ragar, 600 So. 2d 1203 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992)
    …costs. In my view, the failure to conduct a hearing, to take testimony on the contested issues and to make appropriate findings in accordance with Florida Patient’s Compensation Fund v. Rowe, 472 So. 2d 1145 (Fla.1985) was error. Castranova v. Auth, 590 So. 2d 28 (Fla. 5th DCA1991); Prom v. Prom, 589 So. 2d 1363 (Fla. 1st DCA1991); Gamba v. Gamba, 587 So. 2d 1162 (Fla. 4th DCA1991). Although the stipulation obviated the need to prove the amount of fees incurred, husband expressly reserved the issue of reason…
  • …torney’s fee’ is an unliquidated item of damages because testimony must be taken to ascertain facts upon which a judge or jury can ---PAGE 4--- base a value judgment. A trial is necessary to establish unliquidated damages.”); Castranova v. Auth, 590 So. 2d 28, 29 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991) (“Now it must be done in accordance with Rowe, by having a complete evidentiary hearing and entering an order with specific findings.”). Professional argues that United Auto waived its right to an evidentiary hearing by f…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw