JOSIAH E. BURDEN AND CLARISSA I. BURDEN, APPELLANTS,
v.
NORTHSIDE DODGE, INC., ET AL., APPELLEES
JOSIAH E. BURDEN AND CLARISSA I. BURDEN, APPELLANTS,
NORTHSIDE DODGE, INC., ET AL., APPELLEES
590 So. 2d 979
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1991)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a), the final judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.
JOANOS, C.J., and WOLF and KAHN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Larzelere v. State, 676 So. 2d 394 (Fla. 1996)…So. 2d 956 (Fla.1984). Nevertheless, a defendant’s fundamental right to conflict-free counsel can be waived. United States v. Rodriguez, 982 F. 2d 474 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 901, 114 S.Ct. 275, 126 L.Ed.2d 226 (1993); Woseley v. State, 590 So. 2d 979 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). For a waiver to be valid, the record must show that the defendant was aware of the conflict of interest, that the defendant realized the conflict could affect the defense, and that the defendant knew of the right to obtain other…
-
Valdez v. State, 847 So. 2d 602 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003)…h counsel of his or her choosing under the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution. See Wheat v. United States, 486 U.S. 153, 108 S.Ct. 1692, 100 L.Ed.2d 140 (1988); Robinson v. State, 750 So. 2d 58 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). In Woseley v. State, 590 So. 2d 979 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991) the First District explained: In a criminal case, the existence of a conflict of interest is not determinative because the defendant has a constitutionally guaranteed right to counsel of his choice. Id. at 980 (citing DeArce v.…