DWAYNE GARCIA, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1991-12-24
No. 90-2245
Before HUBBART, COPE and GERSTEN, JJ.
591 So. 2d 307 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1991) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Dwayne Garcia pled nolo contendere to possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, reserving the right to appeal the trial court’s denial of his motion to dismiss the charge. Defendant argues that prosecution of that charge was precluded by the doctrine of collateral estoppel, by reason of defendant’s acquittal on the severed charges of attempted first degree murder with a firearm and possession of a firearm during a criminal offense. See Gragg v. State, 429 So. 2d 1204 (Fla.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 820, 104 S.Ct. 83, 78 L.Ed.2d 93 (1983). As we view this record, collateral estoppel did not preclude prosecution of defendant on the current charge. We are unable to say that the issue of possession was decided by the jury in the prior case, see 429 So. 2d at 1206, as the earlier acquittal was consistent with the theory that defendant possessed a firearm but did not shoot the victim.

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • State v. Harwood, 800 So. 2d 308 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)
    …defendant possessed a firearm was not necessarily determined by the jury. The jury’s decision to acquit the defendant could have been grounded on an issue other than whether the defendant possessed a firearm during the incident. See Garcia v. State, 591 So. 2d 307 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991). Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings. Reversed and remanded.…
  • Eugene Morris aka Gatorbait v. State, 702 So. 2d 304 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)
    …[*305] PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Garcia v. State, 591 So. 2d 307 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991).…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw