CORNELIUS C. SIRMONS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
CORNELIUS C. SIRMONS, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
595 So. 2d 582
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1992)
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Davis v. State, 528 So. 2d 521 (Fla. 2d DCA), review denied, 536 So. 2d 243 (Fla.1988). We recognize that our decision in Davis is in conflict with Lang v. State, 566 So. 2d 1354 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990).
DANAHY, A.C.J., and PATTERSON, J., concur. PARKER, J., concurs specially.
Concurrence
PARKER, Judge,
concurring specially.
I concur with the majority. But for this court’s opinion in Davis, I would reverse this case because the record fails to show that Sirmons waived the trial court’s required findings under Chapter 39, Florida Statutes. See Evans v. State, 594 So. 2d 835 (Fla.2d DCA 1992) (concurring opinion).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Lang v. State, 566 So. 2d 1354 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990)
- Davis v. State, 528 So. 2d 521 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988)
- Evans v. State, 594 So. 2d 835 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992)
- Davenport v. State, 594 So. 2d 835 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992)