RICHARD COLEMAN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
RICHARD COLEMAN, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
595 So. 2d 1117
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1992)
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
After review of the record and initial brief, we conclude that appellant has failed to demonstrate a preliminary basis for reversal. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s order summarily, pursuant to rule 9.315(a), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure.. This affirmance is, however, without prejudice to appellant filing a motion in the trial court to withdraw his plea. See Meredith v. State, 508 So. 2d 473 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987); Fox v. State, 510 So. 2d 310, 312 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986); Jolly v. State, 392 So. 2d 54 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). See also Williams v. State, 316 So. 2d 267 (Fla.1975).
DOWNEY, LETTS and WARNER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Williams v. State, 316 So. 2d 267 (Fla. 1975)
- Jolly v. State, 392 So. 2d 54 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981)
- Meredith v. State, 508 So. 2d 473 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987)
- State v. Saunders, 508 So. 2d 473 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987)
- Smith v. State, 510 So. 2d 310 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986)
- FOX v. State, 510 So. 2d 310 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986)