MARK A. DIENSTAG, APPELLANT,
v.
CYNTHIA J. DIENSTAG, APPELLEE
MARK A. DIENSTAG, APPELLANT,
CYNTHIA J. DIENSTAG, APPELLEE
596 So. 2d 133
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1992)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Bowen v. Bowen, 471 So. 2d 1274 (Fla.1985); Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197 (Fla.1980); Weinstein v. Steele, 590 So. 2d 1005 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); Bergstrom v. Bergstrom, 559 So. 2d 82 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 574 So. 2d 139 (Fla.1990); Gustafson v. Jensen, 515 So. 2d 1298 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); O’Neal v. O’Neal, 410 So. 2d 1369 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Tagge Franzen v. Lacuna Golf Ltd. P'ship, 717 So. 2d 1090 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)…rs, Inc. and Doug Ford Golf Shops, Inc. were not signatories or parties to the Agreement or the Declaration. Therefore, they are not entitled to attorney’s fees under the Declaration’s prevailing party provision. See Bird Lakes Dev. Corp. v. Raskin, 596 So. 2d 133, 134 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Baldoria v. Security Realty Inv., Inc., 581 So. 2d 189, 191 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 592 So. 2d 679 (Fla.1991). Likewise, the individual appellees are not entitled to fees under the contract because they were not parties…
-
Nat'l Title Ins. Co. v. Safeco Title Ins. Co., 661 So. 2d 1234 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)…v. Barnett Bank, 377 So. 2d 1150,1152 (Fla.1979) (“Even when based on erroneous reasoning, a conclusion or decision of a trial court will generally be affirmed if the evidence or an alternative theory supports it.”); Bird Lakes Dev. Corp. v. Raskin, 596 So. 2d 133 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992) (trial court may be upheld for any reason appearing in the record). [*1237] In sum, we reverse on the cross-appeal, and remand this case to the trial court with directions to enter a directed verdict for Safeco. As to the remainin…
-
First States Invs. 3300, LLC v. Pheil, 52 So. 3d 845 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011)…date, First States is not entitled to recover prevailing party attorneys’ fees based on the contracts and section 57.105(7). See Commercial Serv. of Perry, Inc. v. Campbell, 861 So. 2d 1258, 1261 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); Bird Lakes Dev. Corp. v. Raskin, 596 So. 2d 133, 135 n. 1 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992) (both recognizing that unilateral attorneys’ fees provisions in contracts predating amendment to section 57.105 were valid and enforceable). Regarding First States’ request for costs, First States has sought relief in t…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197 (Fla. 1980)
- Eugenia Bowen & the Fla. Dep't of Health & Rehabilitative Servs. v. Bowen, 471 So. 2d 1274 (Fla. 1985)
- O'Neal v. O'Neal, 410 So. 2d 1369 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982)
- Anne-Lise Gustafson v. Dorrit Jensen, 515 So. 2d 1298 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)
- Bergstrom v. Bergstrom, 559 So. 2d 82 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)
- Weinstein v. Francine R. Steele, 590 So. 2d 1005 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)