JERRY BELL, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Clerical Error In Judgment cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
The trial court erred in sentencing this appellant by failing to comply with section 39.059(7)(c), Florida Statutes (1991). Specifically, the trial court must address each of the statutory criteria in a written order. See Riley v. State, 588 So. 2d 1035 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); Kohler v. State, 588 So. 2d 689 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); Flowers v. State, 546 So. 2d 782 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989). We remand for resentencing in accordance with the statute.
We also note that the judgment indicates that appellant is being sentenced as a youthful offender in accordance with section 958.04, Florida Statutes (1989), yet his sentence far exceeds the maximum allowable under that statute. On remand, if after consideration of all of the criteria under section 39.059(7)(c) the trial court enters the same sentence, it should correct the judgment to delete what appears to be a clerical error that the defendant is sentenced as a youthful offender. STONE, WARNER and POLEN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Troutman v. State, 630 So. 2d 528 (Fla. 1993)…BARKETT, Chief Justice. We review Troutman v. State, 603 So. 2d 608 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), based on express and direct conflict with State v. Rhoden, 448 So. 2d 1013 (Fla.1984), Bell v. State, 598 So. 2d 203 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992), Meyers v. State, 593 So. 2d 609 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992), and [*530] Flowers v. State, 546 So. 2d 782 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989).1 The issues are whether a trial court must consider each of the statutory criteria required under sections 39.…
-
Fletcher Berry v. State, 636 So. 2d 555 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994)…iewed did not involve the issue of waiver of rights under section 39.059(7). See Troutman v. State, 603 So. 2d 608 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). Moreover, none of the other decisions cited as the basis for conflict involved a waiver issue. See Bell v. State, 598 So. 2d 203 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992); Meyers v. State, 593 So. 2d 609 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992); Flowers v. State, 546 So. 2d 782 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989). . The First District declined to follow Preston v. State, 411 So. 2d 297 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 418 So. 2d 1280 (…
Authorities Cited
- Vance H. Flowers v. State, 546 So. 2d 782 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989)
- Riley v. State, 588 So. 2d 1035 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991)
- Gill v. USX Corp. & Alexsis, Inc., 588 So. 2d 1035 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991)
- Kohler v. State, 588 So. 2d 689 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991)