RHONDA RENAE WILLIAMS A/K/A RHONDA RONAE WILLIAMS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Oral Pronouncement Of Sentence Conditions cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
The appellant challenges her ten-year habitual felony offender sentence for possession of cocaine in circuit court case number 90-10571. We affirm the judgment and habitual felony offender sentence on the authority of King v. State, 597 So. 2d 309 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992) (en banc).
In circuit court case numbers 88-18532, 89-2210, and 89-11320, we strike from the written probation order the notation which states “same terms and conditions.” Because the trial court did not orally pronounce at sentencing this special condition of probation, it is invalid. See Williams v. State, 542 So. 2d 479 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). We note, as the trial court stated at sentencing, that the appellant shall receive credit for all time served.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part.
LEHAN, C.J., and RYDER and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Carter v. State, 606 So. 2d 680 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992)…d 89-4362) contains a handwritten notation, “Same Terms & Conditions.” Because the trial court did not pronounce orally this condition of probation at sentencing, we strike this phrase from Carter’s written order of probation. See Williams v. State, 601 So. 2d 635 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); Williams v. State, 542 So. 2d 479 (Fla.2d DCA 1989). Further, the order of probation contains condition six, entered in writing by the trial court in all three cases, which states “[y]ou will not use intoxicants to excess; nor w…
Authorities Cited
- King v. State, 597 So. 2d 309 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992)
- Williams v. State, 542 So. 2d 479 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989)
- Oden v. State, 542 So. 2d 479 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989)