WILLIAM STEVEN HELLER, PETITIONER,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By

• Brown v. State, 715 So. 2d 241 (Fla. 1998)
  …o. 2d 725, 727 (Fla.1978) ("Our speedy trial rule was promulgated in order to promote the efficient operation of the court system and to act as a stimulus to prosecutors to bring defendants to trial as soon as practicable_”). . See Heller v. State, 601 So. 2d 642 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Vallieres v. Grossman, 573 So. 2d 196 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); Tascarella v. Seay, 564 So. 2d 205 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). Cf. J.T. v. State, 601 So. 2d 283 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992) (same rule for juvenile proceedings).…

  ← 1 / 3 →
• State v. Bryant Eubanks, 630 So. 2d 200 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993)
  …196 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991) and Tascarella v. Seay, 564 So. 2d 205 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. denied, 569 So. 2d 1280 (Fla.1990), that an extension for a speedy trial cannot be obtained after the expiration of the 175 day time period. Accord Heller v. State, 601 So. 2d 642 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992). Although Vallieres, Tascarella and Heller involved motions for extension for exceptional circumstances, the same principle of law applies here. Accordingly, we agree that the trial court had no authority on May 4, 1990, to grant…
• Brown v. State, 695 So. 2d 1275 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997)
  …with no discussion of the facts. Vallieres v. Grossman, 573 So. 2d 196, 197 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991) (holding that “an extension of speedy trial time cannot be obtained for ‘exceptional circumstances’ after expiration of the 175 days”); Heller v. State, 601 So. 2d 642, 642 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992) (“The fifteen-day window period provided the State by rule 3.191(i)(3), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, to proceed with a trial of the defendant after the speedy trial period has expired and a motion for discharge has be…

  ← 1 / 2 →

Authorities Cited

• Tascarella v. The Honorable Russell E. Seay, Jr., 564 So. 2d 205 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990)
• Wooden v. State, 601 So. 2d 283 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)