COASTAL PETROLEUM COMPANY, PETITIONER,
v.
MOBIL OIL CORPORATION, RESPONDENT

Fla. 1st DCA | 1992-08-28
No. 91-3034
ALLEN, KAHN and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.
604 So. 2d 564 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1992) Caution
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

In light of the supreme court’s unpublished order in Coastal Petroleum Co. v. Mobil Oil Corp., No. 74,975 (Fla. May 20, 1992), we vacate our opinion in Coastal Petroleum Co. v. Mobil Oil Corp., 595 So. 2d 226 (Fla. 1st DCÁ1992), and direct the trial court to hold an evidentiary hearing in accordance with the principles announced in Coastal Petroleum Co. v. Mobil Oil Corp., 583 So. 2d 1022 (Fla.1991).

ALLEN, KAHN and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • State of Fla. Dep't OF Revenue v. Fackler, 843 So. 2d 994 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003)
    …Rules of Civil Procedure and case law permit a trial court, in its discretion, to accept affidavits to supplement other affidavits, even if the supplemental affidavits are late. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.510(e); Roberts by and through Drusko v. Abrunzo, 604 So. 2d 564 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). Trial courts need not accept supplemental affidavits that conflict with earlier-filed affidavits from the same party. See International Cmty. Corp.Tampa v. Davis Water and Waste Indus., Inc., 455 So. 2d 1164, 1166 (Fla. 2d DCA 19…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw