ARLICE ELLIS BROWN, APPELLANT,
v.
DEBRA MAXINE BROWN, APPELLEE
ARLICE ELLIS BROWN, APPELLANT,
DEBRA MAXINE BROWN, APPELLEE
604 So. 2d 932
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1992)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
In that we have concluded that the order appealed from was one clarifying that portion of the final judgment of dissolution pertaining to the noncustodial parent’s right to visitation, rather than a modification of visitation, cf. Buttermore v. Meyer, 559 So. 2d 357, 359 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990), the order appealed is
AFFIRMED.
JOANOS, C.J., and ERVIN and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Fussell v. Fussell, 778 So. 2d 517 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001)…h a written agreement, and the trial court placed no limits on the child calling the father. We hold that the trial court did not modify, but rather interpreted and clarified the final judgment’s telephonic visitation provision. See Brown v. Brown, 604 So. 2d 932 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)(affirming a trial court order by concluding the order was a clarification of the noncustodial parent’s visitation rights rather than a modification). The final judgment stated, “[wjhen the child is with one parent, the other par…
Authorities Cited
- Buttermore v. Meyer, 559 So. 2d 357 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)