GERALD BRUCE DOWLING, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Fla. | 1992-10-08
No. 79135
BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.
605 So. 2d 465 Florida Supreme Court (1992) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We have for review Dowling v. State, 588 So. 2d 1093 (Fla. 3d DCA1991), a per curiam decision without opinion citing to State v. Pardo, 582 So. 2d 1225 (Fla. 3d DCA1991), quashed in part and approved in part, 596 So. 2d 665 (Fla.1992), which was pending review in this Court. We have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution. See State v. Lofton, 534 So. 2d 1148 (Fla.1988); Jollie v. State, 405 So. 2d 418 (Fla.1981).

We recently quashed in part and approved in part the district court decision in Pardo which was relied on below. 596 So. 2d at 668. Accordingly, the decision under review is quashed and the cause is remanded for reconsideration in light of our decision in Pardo.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Dowling v. State, 618 So. 2d 373 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993)
    …PER CURIAM. We have reconsidered this case in light of the Supreme Court’s mandate in Dowling v. State, 605 So. 2d 465 (Fla.1992). We affirm based upon Pardo v. State, 596 So. 2d 665 (Fla.1992). We are affirming the convictions in this case because the admission of the child hearsay testimony did not rise to the level of reversible error. However, we caution the S…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw