GERALD BRUCE DOWLING, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1993-05-25
No. 90-1306
Before HUBBART, BASKIN and GERSTEN, JJ.
618 So. 2d 373 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1993)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We have reconsidered this case in light of the Supreme Court’s mandate in Dowling v. State, 605 So. 2d 465 (Fla.1992). We affirm based upon Pardo v. State, 596 So. 2d 665 (Fla.1992).

We are affirming the convictions in this case because the admission of the child hearsay testimony did not rise to the level of reversible error. However, we caution the State that we will continue to scrutinize the admission of child hearsay testimony to prevent prosecutorial overkill.

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw