PEDRO GALBAN, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1992-09-29
No. 91-2434
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and FERGUSON, JJ.
605 So. 2d 579 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1992) Caution
Cited by 8 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is brought from convictions for second-degree murder and use of a firearm in the commission of a felony. We find no error in the trial court’s refusal to allow defense counsel to cross-examine the State’s witness with a hypothetical question that bore no relation to the facts of this case. See Sims v. State, 602 So. 2d 1253 (Fla.1992) (exclusion of immaterial evidence is not error); § 90.401, Fla.Stat. (1991).

We reverse the conviction for use of a firearm in the commission of a felony, however, on the authority of Pearson v. State, 603 So. 2d 676 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992), where we held that convictions for second-degree murder with a firearm and unlawful possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony, based on the same act, were impermissibly duplicitous. Accord Goodman v. State, 567 So. 2d 37 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for resentencing.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Sanders v. State, 621 So. 2d 723 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993)
    …cluded in the armed robbery offense. . See Cleveland v. State, 587 So. 2d 1145 (Fla.1991); State v. McKinnon, 540 So. 2d 111 (Fla.1989); Hall v. State, 517 So. 2d 678 (Fla.1988); Benedit v. State, 610 So. 2d 699 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Galban v. State, 605 So. 2d 579 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Pearson v. State, 603 So. 2d 676 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Davis v. State, 590 So. 2d 496 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); Goodman v. State, 567 So. 2d 37 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Graham v. State, 559 So. 2d 410 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990); Denmark v. State, 538…
  • Benedit v. State, 610 So. 2d 699 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992)
    …r possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony, entered upon an adverse jury verdict, is absolutely barred by the defendant’s constitutional right against double jeopardy. Cleveland v. State, 587 So. 2d 1145 (Fla.1991); Galban v. State, 605 So. 2d 579 (Fla. 3d DCA1992); Pearson v. State, 603 So. 2d 676 (Fla. 3d DCA1992); Sessions v. State, 597 So. 2d 832 (Fla. 3d DCA1992); Goodman v. State, 567 So. 2d 37 (Fla. 3d DCA1990); Henderson v. State, 526 So. 2d 743 (Fla. 3d DCA1988). This being so, the d…
  • Morris Lee Sales v. State, 653 So. 2d 456 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)
    …arm and possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony, based upon the same act, were impermissibly duplicative and violated the defendant’s double jeopardy rights. See Thomas v. State, 617 So. 2d 1128 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); Galban v. State, 605 So. 2d 579 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Nixon v. State, 603 So. 2d 660 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992). Accordingly, the conviction for possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony must be reversed. Affirmed in part; reversed in part, and remanded for resentencing.…

Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw