MORRIS LEE SALES, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1995-04-05
No. 93-2790
Before NESBITT, BASKIN and GERSTEN, JJ.
653 So. 2d 456 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1995) Positive Treatment
Cited by 7 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Morris Lee Sales, seeks reversal of his convictions for second degree murder with a firearm and unlawful possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony. We affirm the judgment and sentence on the second degree murder count. However we vacate the conviction for possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony.

The defendant’s separate convictions for second degree murder with a firearm and possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony, based upon the same act, were impermissibly duplicative and violated the defendant’s double jeopardy rights. See Thomas v. State, 617 So. 2d 1128 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); Galban v. State, 605 So. 2d 579 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Nixon v. State, 603 So. 2d 660 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992). Accordingly, the conviction for possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony must be reversed.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part, and remanded for resentencing.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Gantorius v. State, 761 So. 2d 488 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)
    ….1991); Marmol v. State, 750 So. 2d 764, 766 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000); Acosta v. State, 738 So. 2d 487, 488 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); Vidal v. State, 704 So. 2d 746 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); Wimberly v. State, 649 So. 2d 338 (Fla. 3d [*490] DCA 1995); Sales v. State, 653 So. 2d 456 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995). Accordingly, we reverse with directions that the appellant’s conviction and sentence for possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony be vacated. Obviously, our resolution of this issue is squarely dependent upon ou…
  • Perry v. Singletary, 697 So. 2d 1323 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)
    …nlawful possession of a firearm while engaged in a criminal offense. The separate convictions were, as petitioner suggests, based on the same act. The petition is therefore meritorious. Cleveland v. State, 587 So. 2d 1145 (Fla.1991); Sales v. State, 653 So. 2d 456 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995). We reverse the petitioner’s conviction and sentence in count 3 of the information. We remand to the trial court with directions to vacate the judgment of conviction and sentence. Reversed and remanded with instructions.…
  • LEE v. State (Fla. 3d DCA 2021)
    …); see also Cleveland v. State, 587 So. 2d 1145, 1146 (Fla. 1991); Marmol v. State, 750 So.2d 764, 766 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000); Acosta v. State, 738 So. 2d 487, 488 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); Vidal v. State, 704 So. 2d 746 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); Sales v. State, 653 So. 2d 456 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995). Accordingly, we reverse with directions that Lee’s conviction and sentence for possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony be vacated. We find Lee’s remaining argument regarding exclusion of the defense expert o…

Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw