CITY OF PORT SAINT LUCIE AND TRI-COUNTY INSURANCE COUNCIL, APPELLANTS,
v.
LILLIAN CHAMBERS, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
This workers' compensation appeal addresses whether a newspaper carrier for The Palm Beach Post was an employee or independent contractor for purposes of calculating average weekly wage. The court held that the carrier was an independent contractor and reversed the lower court's decision to include her newspaper delivery earnings in the wage calculation.
The court held that Chambers was an independent contractor, not an employee, and therefore her earnings from newspaper delivery must be excluded from the average weekly wage calculation under section 440.02(13)(d)1, Florida Statutes.
[1] Earnings of an independent contractor are excluded from average weekly wage calculations in workers' compensation cases.
[2] Newspaper carriers, under circumstances where they determine delivery methods, provide their own transportation and insurance, and furnish their own substitutes, are gene…
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Although wages from concurrent employment are generally included in AWW calculations, the exclusion of independent contractors from the definition of employees in section 440.02(13)(d)l, Florida Statutes (1989), dictates that earnings of an independent contractor are excluded from AWW calculations.”
Establishes the statutory framework requiring exclusion of independent contractor earnings from wage calculations
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceOn July 6, 1989, Lillian Chambers was injured while working as a camp counselor for the City of Port St. Lucie. She concurrently delivered newspapers …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Concurrent Employment cases and more on FLexlaw
BOOTH, Judge.
This cause is before us on appeal from a final order awarding an increase in claimant’s average weekly wage (AWW) based on concurrent employment. The sole issue on appeal is whether claimant was an employee of The Palm Beach Post (the Post).
On July 6, 1989, claimant was injured in a work-related accident while working as a camp counselor with the City of Port St. Lucie. Concurrently, claimant delivered newspapers for the Post. The Post classified claimant as an independent contractor, and she signed an independent contractor agreement. Under the terms of the contract, the newspaper carrier determines the method of delivery, the means of conveyance, provides her own transportation, provides her own vehicular insurance, furnishes a security bond, and furnishes a substitute carrier of the designated carrier’s choice in case of absence. The newspaper carrier does not receive the same benefits and is not subjected to the same withhold-ings as employees of the paper. Claimant testified that she was given an established paper route by the Post and obtained all her customers from the Post. Claimant was supplied a daily customer list from the Post to determine who would receive the paper on a particular day. Claimant picked up the papers at the Post’s warehouse before 4:00 a.m. and delivered the papers before 6:30 a.m. Claimant provided her own transportation and operating costs of her vehicle and was paid 15 cents per daily paper and 45 cents per Sunday paper delivered. No social security or federal taxes were withheld from her check.
Although wages from concurrent employment are generally included in AWW calculations, the exclusion of independent contractors from the definition of employees in section 440.02(13)(d)l, Florida Statutes (1989), dictates that earnings of an independent contractor are excluded from AWW calculations. Edwards v. Caulfield, 560 So. 2d 364 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990).
Under similar factual circumstances, the courts of this state have held that newspaper carriers are independent contractors. See Florida Publishing Co. v. Lourcey, 141 Fla. 767, 193 So. 847 (Fla.1940); Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. Kendall, 88 So. 2d 276 (Fla.1956); Walker v. Palm Beach Newspapers, Inc., 561 So. 2d 1198 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990), dismissed, 576 So. 2d 294 (Fla.1990); Parker v. Sugar Cane Growers Co-op, 595 So. 2d 1022 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Hopkins v. Department of Transportation, 596 So. 2d 680 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). Although some of the foregoing cases are civil tort actions, we find no basis for distinguishing between workers’ compensation and civil cases when determining whether a person is an independent contractor or an employee.
Accordingly, we hold that claimant was an independent contractor for purposes of workers’ compensation benefits. We must reverse and remand for proceedings consistent herewith.
SMITH, J., concurs.
BARFIELD, J., concurs with written opinion.
BARFIELD, J.,
concurring.
I agree that the result reached by the majority is mandated by the decisions cited in the majority opinion. Were it not for those decisions which appear to exclude newspaper carriers as a class from being employees, I would conclude that they must be evaluated individually under the test for independent contractors. When viewed realistically the only things that the newspaper carriers do of their own volition under these facts are provide their means of transportation and find replacements to deliver their papers on the days that they are unable to do so. The notion that the carrier is somehow independent by determining methods of delivery, means of conveyance and type of transportation is like calling a carpenter an independent contractor because he brings his own hammer to work and drives the nails with his left hand rather than his right.
I agree with the majority that the concept of independent contractor should not vary from one legal discipline to another. I do find fault with the historical exclusion of newspaper carriers as a class from coverage as employees. Since the supreme court has chosen to define these identical characteristics as those of an independent contractor, we have no choice but to adhere to that precedent. Perhaps it warrants reconsideration by those that created the class.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Keith v. News & SUN Sentinel Co., 667 So. 2d 167 (Fla. 1995)…case are harmonious with this idea. Id. Following Kendall, some courts have seized upon this passage to conclude that Kendall created a conclusive presumption that newscarriers are independent contractors. E.g., City of Port St. Lucie v. Chambers, 606 So. 2d 450 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992) (Barfield, J., concurring), review denied, 618 So. 2d 208 (Fla.1993); Walker v. Palm Beach Newspapers, Inc., 561 So. 2d 1198 (Fla. 5th DCA) (Sharp, J., concurring specially), dismissed, 576 So. 2d 294 (Fla.1990); Peairs v. Florid…
-
Fort Pierce Tribune & Claims Ctr. v. Williams, 622 So. 2d 1368 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993)…the Fort Pierce Tribune, was an employee, rather than an independent contractor, thereby allowing her injury to be found compensable. We consider the facts of this case to be nearly indistinguishable from those in City of Port St. Lucie v. Chambers, 606 So. 2d 450 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), review denied, 618 So. 2d 208 (Fla.1993), and therefore reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with that opinion. Although we are constrained to reverse, we are aware that there is considerable authority for deci…
-
Raulerson v. Sentinel, 655 So. 2d 1237 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995)…); Keith v. News & Sun Sentinel, 631 So. 2d 333 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); Fort Pierce Tribune v. Williams, 622 So. 2d 1368 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993), rev. granted, Williams v. Fort Pierce Tribune, 640 So. 2d 1109 (Fla.1994); City of Port St. Lucie v. Chambers, 606 So. 2d 450 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), rev. den., Chambers v. City of Port St. Lucie/Tri-County Ins. Council, 618 So. 2d 208 (Fla. 1993); Walker v. Palm Beach Newspapers, 561 So. 2d 1198 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. dismissed, 576 So. 2d 294 (Fla.1990). .See footnote 2.…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- The Miami Herald Publ'g Co. v. Mrs. Mary Kendall, 88 So. 2d 276 (Fla. 1956)
- Edwards v. Caulfield, 560 So. 2d 364 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)
- Fla. Publ'g Co. v. Lourcey, 141 Fla. 767 (Fla. 1940)
- A.J. v. State, 561 So. 2d 1198 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)
- Walker v. Palm Beach Newspapers, Inc., 561 So. 2d 1198 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990)
- Parker v. Sugar Cane Growers Co-Op & Nat'l Emp'rs Co., 595 So. 2d 1022 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)
- Hopkins v. State, 596 So. 2d 680 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991)