DONNA LOU NESMITH, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that a warrantless arrest for a misdemeanor is invalid if the offense was not committed in the arresting officer's presence, rendering a search incident to that arrest unlawful.
Appellant was arrested for nude dancing in a bar selling alcohol, a misdemeanor. A search incident to this arrest uncovered cocaine. The arresting off…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Offense Committed In Officer'S Presence cases and more on FLexlaw
THREADGILL, Judge.
The appellant challenges the denial of her motion to suppress cocaine found in her wallet incident to her warrantless arrest for a misdemeanor in violation of a Polk County Ordinance.1 We reverse.
On February 13, 1986, the appellant was arrested in the bar of La Pleasures Lounge in Auburndale for nude dancing in an establishment that sells alcoholic beverages, a violation of Polk County Ordinance 81-25 and 83-21. A female officer summoned by the arresting officers conducted the search incident to arrest that uncovered the cocaine. Although she testified at the suppression hearing, she had not seen the appellant commit the misdemeanor. On October 3,1991, the appellant entered a plea of nolo contendere to possession of cocaine in violation of section 893.13(l)(e), Florida Statutes (1985), reserving the right to appeal the denial of her motion to suppress.
A law enforcement officer may only effect a warrantless arrest for a misdemean-or when it has been committed in his presence. § 901.15(1), Fla.Stat. (1985); Peterson v. State, 578 So. 2d 749 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991).
Although the female officer testified that she was summoned to assist in the arrest, there was no testimony from any officer who actually witnessed the violation. In the absence of such evidence, the state failed to prove that the search was incident to a valid arrest.
We therefore reverse the order denying suppression of the cocaine.
Reversed and remanded.
LEHAN, C.J., and RYDER, J., concur. . § 125.69, Fla.Stat. (1985).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Nickell v. State, 722 So. 2d 924 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998)…1995). Therefore, the officer lacked probable cause to arrest Nickell for a felony. Moreover, the officer was not authorized' to arrest Nickell for a misdemeanor because the offense was committed outside the officer’s presence. See Nesmith v. State, 608 So. 2d 96, 96 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). Because the arrest was invalid, all fruits of the search incident to that arrest should have been suppressed. See Montalvo v. State, 520 So. 2d 292, 294 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); Sanders v. State, 385 So. 2d 735, 738 (Fla. 2d DCA 1…
-
State v. Taylor, 743 So. 2d 1200 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999)…PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Nesmith v. State, 608 So. 2d 96 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). ANTOON, C.J., DAUKSCH and COBB, JJ., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- Peterson v. State, 578 So. 2d 749 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991)