STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,

v.

DAVID LEE TAYLOR, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Crutcher v. Sch. Bd. OF Broward Cnty. & Gallagher Bassett Servs., Inc., 834 So. 2d 228 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002)
  …ing the carrier to continue to assert a statute of limitations defense after failure to comply with this statutorily mandated requirement renders such requirement meaningless. The majority relies on Tallahassee Memorial Healthcare, Inc. v. Coleman, 743 So. 2d 1200 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999), for support in its remand. However, in Coleman, it is unclear whether the carrier failed to comply with the notice requirement in section 440.185. The JCC merely concluded that the claimant had not been apprised of her rights un…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Fontanills v. Hillsborough Cnty. Sch. Bd., 913 So. 2d 28 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005)
  …, the [*30] JCC’s reliance there on the court’s opinion in Hanssen was incorrect because Hans-sen had dealt with a prior version of section 440.19. While the court explained in Crutcher, as it had in Tallahassee Memorial Healthcare, Inc. v. Coleman, 743 So. 2d 1200 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999), that the statutory limitation period is not tolled solely by the failure of an E/C to advise an injured worker that a statute of limitations exists, nevertheless, because of the 1994 amendment to section 440.19,1 the court reman…
• Holt v. Keetley, 250 So. 3d 206 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018)

Authorities Cited

• Nesmith v. State, 608 So. 2d 96 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992)