ANTHONY G. MOORE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Motion For Jail Credit cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Anthony Moore appeals the summary denial of his motion for jail time credit. In his motion, Moore alleged that although he was incarcerated from February 14, 1992 until June 22, 1992, he only received credit for sixteen days spent in jail. The trial judge denied the motion without attaching to his order any portion of the files or records to refute appellant’s allegations.
Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion and remand the case to the trial court. On remand, unless the files and records of the case conclusively show that the appellant is entitled to no relief, the court shall order the state attorney to file an answer within a time certain. After receipt of the answer, the court shall determine whether an evidentiary hearing is required. If the court should again deny appellant’s motion, he has thirty days in which to appeal.
Reversed and remanded.
DANAHY, A.C.J., and PATTERSON and BLUE, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Abel Oliveros Reyes v. State, 655 So. 2d 111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995)…r. Reyes has not been convicted of any offense in this case. His adjudication was withheld. Accordingly, costs of prosecution cannot be imposed directly under section 939.01 because that section only authorizes costs upon conviction. Knaus v. State, 608 So. 2d 557 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); Clinger v. State, 533 So. 2d 315 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988). Nevertheless, a trial court may impose comparable costs as a special condition of probation under section 948.03(5), Florida Statutes (1991). Knaus, 608 So. 2d at 558; Clinger…1 / 2
-
Boyd v. State, 654 So. 2d 993 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995)…lant contends, and we agree, that the cost was not authorized by section 939.01, because he was not “convicted,” rather, adjudication was withheld, see Reyes v. State, 655 So. 2d 111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995) (en banc opinion on rehearing); Knaus v. State, 608 So. 2d 557 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); Clinger v. State, 533 So. 2d 315 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988). However, appellant acknowledges that under the theory set out in Clinger, when adjudication is withheld, the cost can be imposed as a condition of probation.1 Next, appellant…
-
Lacrecia Amanda White v. State, 22 So. 3d 157 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009)…n withhold of adjudication under statute that authorized imposition only upon conviction), superseded by statute, § 938.15, Fla. Stat. (1997), on other grounds as recognized in Waller v. State, 911 So. 2d 226, 227 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); Knaus v. State, 608 So. 2d 557, 558 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992) (same); see also J.S. v. State, 19 So. 3d 380, 380 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) (striking costs imposed upon withhold of adjudication in juvenile context where statute authorized imposition only upon adjudication). Judgment and sente…