MCKINLEY HARRIS, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1992-11-10
No. 91-896
Before NESBITT, FERGUSON and LEVY, JJ.
608 So. 2d 898 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1992) Caution
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

[*899] PER CURIAM.

In the instant case, the trial court and the parties agreed that defendant McKinley Harris would be formally sentenced on drug possession and aggravated battery charges, then furloughed for six days. As part of the agreement, the trial judge ordered that if the defendant had no further violations during that time, upon his return for commitment, defendant’s sentence would be significantly mitigated. During the furlough period, defendant was arrested for the sale of cocaine within 1,000 feet of school property. Thereafter, the trial judge ordered the mutually agreed sentencing bargain enforced. We affirm.

As stated in Harris v. State, 524 So. 2d 1104 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988), there is no reason why the terms of a mutually agreed sentencing bargain should not be enforced. See Jacobs v. State, 522 So. 2d 540 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 531 So. 2d 1353 (Fla. 1988); Lee v. State, 471 So. 2d 195 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). Because the defendant subsequently pled guilty and was sentenced for the latter offense upon which the the court’s refusal to mitigate was based, it is now clear that the defendant breached the agreement made with the court and mitigation of his sentence was properly refused.

Accordingly, the order under review is affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Rahmings v. State, 636 So. 2d 567 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994)
    …uestion that the defendant in this ease knowingly and voluntarily entered into the furlough agreement with the court. Having clearly breached the agreement, the trial court properly sentenced the defendant pursuant to its terms. See Harris v. State, 608 So. 2d 898 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992). The defendant, however, attempts to distinguish Quarterman, and contends that her [*568] sentence must be reversed based upon Williams v. State, 500 So. 2d 501 (Fla.1986), and our holding in Harris v. State, 524 So. 2d 1104 (Fla…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw