STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER,
v.
RONALD HERBERT HILL, RESPONDENT

Fla. | 1993-02-11
No. 80081
BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, MCDONALD, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.
613 So. 2d 476 Florida Supreme Court (1993)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that the trial court is not relieved of its statutory obligation to make findings regarding habitual felony offender sentencing factors, even if the defendant does not affirmatively raise them as defenses.


Facts & Procedural History

The Fourth District Court of Appeal certified a question regarding the state's burden of proof for habitual felony offender sentencing in light of pri…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
SHAW, Justice.

SHAW, Justice.

We have for review Hill v. State, 602 So. 2d 590 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992), wherein the court certified the following question:

Does the holding in Eutsey v. State, 383 So. 2d 219 (Fla.1980), that the state has no burden of proof as to whether the convictions necessary for habitual felony offender sentencing have been pardoned or set aside, in that they are “affirmative defenses available to [a defendant],” Eutsey at 226, relieve the trial court of its statutory obligation to make findings regarding those factors, if the defendant does not affirmatively raise, as a defense, that the qualifying convictions provided by the state have been pardoned or set aside?

See Hill, 602 So. 2d at 591. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We answered this question in the negative in State v. Rucker, 613 So. 2d 460 (Fla. 1993), but held that harmless error analysis may be applied on appeal. We quash the decision of the district court in Hill and remand for proceedings consistent with Rucker,

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, MCDONALD, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw