RONALD HERBERT HILL, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 1992-06-17
No. 91-2426
GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and DELL and WARNER, JJ., concur.
602 So. 2d 590 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1992) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse appellant’s sentence as a habitual offender because the trial court failed to make the requisite findings pursuant to section 775.084(l)(a), Florida Statutes (1989). See Rolle v. State, 586 So. 2d 1293 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); Simon v. State, 589 So. 2d 381 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); Anderson v. State, 592 So. 2d 1119 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). We also adopt the question certified by the First District Court of Appeal in Anderson, and certify it as one of great public importance as restated in Banes v. State, 597 So. 2d 975 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992).

On remand, the trial court may again sentence appellant as a habitual offender provided it makes findings, supported by evidence, as required by section 775.-084(1)(a). See Meehan v. State, 526 So. 2d 1083 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988).

GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and DELL and WARNER, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • State v. Hill, 613 So. 2d 476 (Fla. 1993)
    …SHAW, Justice. We have for review Hill v. State, 602 So. 2d 590 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992), wherein the court certified the following question: Does the holding in Eutsey v. State, 383 So. 2d 219 (Fla.1980), that the state has no burden of proof as to whether the convictions necessary for habitual felony offender sent…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw