CALIFORNIA FEDERAL BANK, ETC., APPELLANT,
v.
DAVID R. HACHEY, ET AL., APPELLEES
CALIFORNIA FEDERAL BANK, ETC., APPELLANT,
DAVID R. HACHEY, ET AL., APPELLEES
614 So. 2d 666
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1993)
Caution
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Dickinson v. Segal, 219 So. 2d 435 (Fla. 1969); Idacon, Inc. v. Hawes, 432 So. 2d 759 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); Wong v. Von Wersebe, 365 So. 2d 429 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
E. Airlines & GAB v. Griffin, 654 So. 2d 1194 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995)…s after the last payment of compensation, because of such person’s lack of due diligence.” The deputy commissioner imposed a due diligence standard on the employer/carrier which is not required by section 440.28.); Metropolitan Dade County v. Barry, 614 So. 2d 666 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993) (Relying on Gallardo, modification pursuant to section 440.28, Florida Statutes, is not precluded even though the portion of the order to be modified was agreed upon by stipulation, and even though the employer may have failed to…1 / 2
-
Millinger v. Broward Cnty. Mental Health Div. & Risk Mgmt., 655 So. 2d 104 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)…way of a petition for modification. See, e.g., Atlantis Nursing Center v. Drink-water, 616 So. 2d 627 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993), citing Morgan Yacht and Oakdell, Inc. v. Gallardo, 505 So. 2d 672 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); and Metropolitan Dade County v. Barry, 614 So. 2d 666 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). . Fla.R.Worlc.Comp.P. 4.141(b), which addresses the JCC’s authority to amend or vacate orders, specifically provides that the JCC may vacate or amend an order which is not yet final by operation of section 440.25, Fla.Stat. Se…
Authorities Cited
- Dickinson v. Segal, 219 So. 2d 435 (Fla. 1969)
- Wong v. Karsten Bodo von Wersebe, 365 So. 2d 429 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978)
- Idacon, Inc. v. Hawes, 432 So. 2d 759 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983)