STEVEN HAYWOOD, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
STEVEN HAYWOOD, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
615 So. 2d 707
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1992)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 9 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The appellant contends that the court erred in denying his motion for postconviction relief as untimely filed. He argues that he had previously filed a motion for postconviction relief that was dismissed without prejudice by the trial court. Apparently, the motion on review here was the resubmission of that motion. If correct, the court erred in denying the motion as untimely filed. See Lemus v. State, 585 So. 2d 388 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). However, since the appellant’s postconviction relief motion fails on its merits, we affirm.
CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Smith v. State, 618 So. 2d 737 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993)…ent of rule 3.850. See Scott v. State, 464 So. 2d 1171 (Fla.1985). Eleven days after the order was entered, appellant resubmitted his motion with the appropriate oath. The trial court erred in denying his motion as time-barred. See Haywood v. State, 615 So. 2d 707 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); Lemus v. State, 585 So. 2d 388 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). Accordingly, we reverse the order of denial and remand for the trial court to rule on the merits of the motion. Reversed and remanded. SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and FRANK and THREA…
-
Abramson v. Fla. Int'l Univ., 704 So. 2d 720 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)…to the disruptive conduct charge, we affirm finding that substantial, competent evidence supports the ruling that Abramson violated the student conduct code by participating in setting fire to model ships in student housing. See Armesto v. Weidner, 615 So. 2d 707 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992), cause dismissed, 624 So. 2d 264 (Fla.1993), and cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1090, 114 S.Ct. 1849, 128 L.Ed.2d 474 (1994); Cohen v. School Board of Dade County, 450 So. 2d 1238 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984). Abramson’s arguments as to due process…
-
Aziz Matar v. Fla. Int'l Univ., 944 So. 2d 1153 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006)…proceedings and that guarantee the academic integrity of the university.” Fla. Admin. Code R. 6C-6.0105(1). An agency violates a person’s due process rights if it ignores rules promulgated thereby which affect individual rights. Armesto v. Weidner, 615 So. 2d 707, 709 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992). Mr. Matar contends that FIU violated his due process rights when it failed to follow its own rules in failing to obtain Mr. Matar’s waiver of a formal hearing before the Review Board in writing. We disagree. FIU followed th…
Previewing 3 of 9 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Lemus v. State, 585 So. 2d 388 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991)