BRIAN K. SMITH, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Florida Rule Of Criminal Procedure 3.850 cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Brian K. Smith appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief, which he filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We reverse.
Appellant filed a motion for postconviction relief within two years from the time his judgment and sentence became final. After the two years had passed, the trial court dismissed the motion without prejudice, primarily for failure to comply with the oath requirement of rule 3.850. See Scott v. State, 464 So. 2d 1171 (Fla.1985). Eleven days after the order was entered, appellant resubmitted his motion with the appropriate oath. The trial court erred in denying his motion as time-barred. See Haywood v. State, 615 So. 2d 707 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); Lemus v. State, 585 So. 2d 388 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). Accordingly, we reverse the order of denial and remand for the trial court to rule on the merits of the motion.
Reversed and remanded.
SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and FRANK and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (12 total)
-
Ayoub v. State, 901 So. 2d 311 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005)…and remand for the trial court to correct the conditions to reflect that the trial court directs the Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles to revoke Ayoub’s driving privilege for two years. See § 322.055, Fla. Stat. (2002); Martin v. State, 618 So. 2d 737, 740 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). For the battery offense, we strike the conditions suspending Ayoub’s driver’s license based on the State’s concession that there is no mandatory requirement of driver’s license suspension or revocation for that offense and…
-
King v. State, 618 So. 2d 740 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993)…tion and sentences are affirmed, except for the requirement that the appellant pay $500 as additional costs for participation in the Bay County Work Program as a condition of probation. This condition is stricken on the authority of Martin v. State, 618 So. 2d 737 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993) (on motion for rehearing). ZEHMER and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.…
-
Jones v. State, 622 So. 2d 1153 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993)…rtue of the oral pronouncement of these conditions at the 1991 sentencing. However, in addition to special condition eleven, we have determined that special condition thirteen also must be stricken. This condition was disapproved in Martin v. State, 618 So. 2d 737 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). Accordingly, this cause is remanded with directions to strike special conditions eleven and thirteen of the probation order. In all other respects, the resentencing disposition is affirmed. ZEHMER, C.J., and JOANOS and BARFI…
Previewing 3 of 12 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Scott v. State, 464 So. 2d 1171 (Fla. 1985)
- Lemus v. State, 585 So. 2d 388 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991)
- Haywood v. State, 615 So. 2d 707 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992)
- Armesto v. Fla. State Univ. Coll. of Law Dean Donald Weidner, 615 So. 2d 707 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992)