STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER,
v.
STANLEY E. ROBERTS, RESPONDENT
STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER,
STANLEY E. ROBERTS, RESPONDENT
616 So. 2d 50
Florida Supreme Court (1993)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
SHAW, Justice.
We have for review Roberts v. State, 606 So. 2d 714 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), wherein the district court certified a question of great public importance. We have jurisdiction. Art. Y, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We have since answered the question in State v. Rucker, 613 So. 2d 460 (Fla.1993). We quash Roberts and remand for proceedings consistent with Rucker. It is so ordered.
BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, MCDONALD, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Peek v. State, 619 So. 2d 434 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993)…al offender sentences when the trial court failed to make the specific findings required by the habitual offender statute, but we certified the question, see Peek v. State, 610 So. 2d 5 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). In State of Florida v. James Tommy Peek, 616 So. 2d 50 (Fla.1993), the supreme court quashed our opinion and remanded for proceedings consistent with State v. Rucker, 613 So. 2d 460, 462 (Fla.1993), in which it held that when the state introduces unrebutted evidence of the defendant’s prior convictions,…
Authorities Cited
- State v. Rucker, 613 So. 2d 460 (Fla. 1993)
- Roberts v. State, 606 So. 2d 714 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)