ROBERT BURATY, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Schenck v. State, 645 So. 2d 71 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994)
  …er where judgment did not recite facts constituting contempt) rev. denied, 629 So. 2d 134 (1993); and Woods v. State, 600 So. 2d 27 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992) (contempt judgment must include recital of facts constituting contempt); accord, Spivey v. State, 616 So. 2d 550 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993); Johnson v. State, 584 So. 2d 95 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); Wells v. State, 487 So. 2d 1101 (Fla. 5th DCA), cause dism’d, 491 So. 2d 281 (Fla.1986); Tenorio v. State, 462 So. 2d 880 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); Osborne v. State, 430 So. 2d 551 (…
• McGLAMORY v. State, 723 So. 2d 388 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999)
  …w the procedural requirements of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.830. The trial court failed to provide a written judgment of guilt reciting the facts upon which the adjudication of guilt is based as required by rule 3.830. See Spivey v. State, 616 So. 2d 550 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993). [*389] Therefore, we reverse McGlamory’s criminal contempt order and remand the case with directions that the trial court render a judgment in compliance with rule 3.830. Reversed and remanded with directions. PARKER, C.J., a…
• Sikorski v. State, 687 So. 2d 46 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997)
  …w the procedural requirements of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.830. The trial court failed to provide a written judgment of guilt reciting the facts upon which the adjudication of guilt is based as required by rule 3.830. See Spivey v. State, 616 So. 2d 550 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993). Therefore, we reverse Sikorski’s direct criminal contempt order and remand the case with directions that the trial court render a judgment in compliance with rule 3.830. Reversed and remanded with directions. FRANK, A.C.J., a…

Authorities Cited

• Arnett LEE, Sr. v. Gray CAB Co., 614 So. 2d 548 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993)