MARCUS C. MCGLAMORY, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.830 cases and more on FLexlaw
WHATLEY, Judge.
Marcus C. McGlamory challenges his adjudication for contempt of court and his sentences for criminal mischief, attempted burglary, and assault. He raises several issues on appeal. We only find error in McGlamo-ry’s adjudication for contempt of court, and we affirm his other judgments and sentences without discussion.
We find no error in the trial court’s determination that McGlamory’s conduct constituted contempt of court. However, McGla-mory argues, and the State agrees, that the trial court did not follow the procedural requirements of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.830. The trial court failed to provide a written judgment of guilt reciting the facts upon which the adjudication of guilt is based as required by rule 3.830. See Spivey v. State, 616 So. 2d 550 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993). Therefore, we reverse McGlamory’s criminal contempt order and remand the case with directions that the trial court render a judgment in compliance with rule 3.830.
Reversed and remanded with directions.
PARKER, C.J., and SALCINES, J., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Cutwright v. State, 934 So. 2d 667 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006)…is case fails to specify the conduct upon which th'e adjudication was based, we must reverse Cutwright’s criminal contempt order and remand with directions that the trial court render a judgment in compliance with rule 3.830. See McGlamory v. State, 723 So. 2d 388, 388 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). We next address whether the trial court erred by imposing a $151 cost pursuant to section 938.085, Florida- Statutes (2004), and a $65 cost pursuant to section 939.185, Florida Statutes (2004). Cutwright committed the sexu…
-
Lorenza Jackson v. State, 779 So. 2d 379 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000)…Jackson’s contemptuous behavior occurred in the presence of the trial court, frustrated an ongoing proceeding, and is apparent on the face of the record. Thus, we affirm the trial court’s finding of direct criminal contempt. See McGlamory v. State, 723 So. 2d 388 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). However, the judgment itself did not contain a recital of the facts upon which the adjudication was based as required by Florida Rule of [*380] Criminal Procedure 3.880. In the context of this rule, the recitation requirement is…
-
Michel Escoto v. State, 178 So. 3d 945 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015)…ee also Montoya v. State, 695 So. 2d 873 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997). We reverse and remand for the trial court to enter a judgment including a recitation of the specific facts upon which the adjudication of contempt was based. See, e.g., McGlamory v. State, 723 So. 2d 388 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999); Montoya, 695 So. 2d 873.…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Buraty v. State, 616 So. 2d 550 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993)
- Spivey v. State, 616 So. 2d 550 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993)