STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
NATHANIEL HIRUM THOMAS, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 1993-04-23
No. 92-1899
HARRIS and THOMPSON, JJ., concur., GOSHORN, C.J., dissents with opinion.
616 So. 2d 637 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1993) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The State appeals from the order of the trial court granting Thomas’s motion to suppress. The identical issue was decided in favor of the State and adversely to Thomas in a companion case. See State v. Thomas, 604 So. 2d 1277 (Fla. 5th DCA1992). Accordingly, we reverse the order and remand the cause for further proceedings.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

HARRIS and THOMPSON, JJ., concur. GOSHORN, C.J., dissents with opinion.

Dissent
GOSHORN, Chief Judge,

[*638] GOSHORN, Chief Judge,

dissenting.

I respectfully dissent for the reasons set forth in my dissent in State v. Thomas, 604 So. 2d 1277 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Thomas v. State, 633 So. 2d 1067 (Fla. 1994)
    …PER CURIAM. Nathaniel H. Thomas seeks review of two decisions of the district court of appeal, State v. Thomas, 604 So. 2d 1277 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992), and State v. Thomas, 616 So. 2d 637 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993), on the ground of conflict. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. We consolidate the two review proceedings for disposition in one opinion. On the authority of our recent decision in State v. Bamber, 630 So. 2d 1048 (Fla.1994), we qua…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw