NATHANIEL H. THOMAS, PETITIONER
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Fla. | 1994-03-24
Nos. 80624, 81657
BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur., McDONALD, J., dissents.
633 So. 2d 1067 Florida Supreme Court (1994)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Nathaniel H. Thomas seeks review of two decisions of the district court of appeal, State v. Thomas, 604 So. 2d 1277 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992), and State v. Thomas, 616 So. 2d 637 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993), on the ground of conflict. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. We consolidate the two review proceedings for disposition in one opinion.

On the authority of our recent decision in State v. Bamber, 630 So. 2d 1048 (Fla.1994), we quash both decisions under review and remand for reconsideration in light of our opinion in Bamber. It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur. McDONALD, J., dissents.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw