ALVIN BAKST, A/K/A ALVIN T. BAKST, APPELLANT,
v.
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, AS RECEIVER OF FIRST AMERICAN BANK AND TRUST, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1993-04-20
No. 92-2248
Before FERGUSON, GERSTEN and GODERICH, JJ.
617 So. 2d 402 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1993) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Alvin Bakst, appeals from a final summary judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff, Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., as receiver of First American Bank and Trust [FDIC]. The affidavit of indebtedness failed to disprove the affirmative defenses raised by the defendant and FDIC failed to demonstrate the legal insufficiency of the defenses. See Campagna v. Dicus, 606 So. 2d 1278 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). Therefore, FDIC is not entitled to a summary judgment. Johnson & Kirby, Inc. v. Citizens Nat’l Bank of Fort Lauderdale, 338 So. 2d 905 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); Underwriters Ins. Co. v. Sisung, 174 So. 2d 461 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965).

Moreover, the defendant concedes that he is liable on the promissory note. However, genuine issues of material fact still exist as to whether payments were properly credited and as to the actual amount of money that is still due. We hold that final summary judgment was improper where genuine issues of material fact remain unresolved, Moore v. Morris, 475 So. 2d 666 (Fla.1985); Holl v. Talcott, 191 So. 2d 40 (Fla.1966), and we reverse and remand this case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Wylie v. Inv. Mgmt. & Research Inc., 629 So. 2d 898 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993)
    …and ANSTEAD, HERSEY, GLICKSTEIN, GUNTHER, STONE, WARNER, POLEN, KLEIN and PARIENTE, JJ., concur. . We note that our decision today is in accord with other District Courts of Appeal considering the question. See Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. v. Clarke, 617 So. 2d 402 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993) (limitations defense must be arbitrated); Marschel v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., 609 So. 2d 718 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992), rev. denied, 617 So. 2d 318 (Fla.1993) (same; parties are free to provide in arbitration agreement that limitatio…
  • …whether interest due under the note was properly calculated. See Fatherly v. California Fed. Bank, FSB, 703 So. 2d 1101 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997); Pearlstein v. Pennsylvania Nat’l Bank & Trust Co., 668 So. 2d 330 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); and Bakst v. F.D.I.C., 617 So. 2d 402 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993). [*125] The remaining issues raised by the appellant are without merit. Reversed and remanded for further proceedings. STONE, HAZOURI, JJ., and STETTIN, HERBERT, Senior Judge, concur.…
  • TLZ Props. v. Kilburn-Young Asset Mgmt. Corp., 937 F. Supp. 1573 (M.D. Fla. 1996)

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw