CARLOS DEMETRESS KING, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
CARLOS DEMETRESS KING, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
618 So. 2d 740
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1993)
Caution
Cited by 16 cases
Opinion of the Court
ALLEN, Judge.
The appellant’s judgments of conviction and sentences are affirmed, except for the requirement that the appellant pay $500 as additional costs for participation in the Bay County Work Program as a condition of probation. This condition is stricken on the authority of Martin v. State, 618 So. 2d 737 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993) (on motion for rehearing).
ZEHMER and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Zeigler v. Zeigler, 635 So. 2d 50 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)…of an agreement that the nonworking spouse will care for the children, the courts of this state have reversed awards of temporary support in lieu of permanent alimony. Anderson v. Anderson, 617 So. 2d 1109 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Shudlick v. Shud-lick, 618 So. 2d 740 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); Wolff v. Wolff, 576 So. 2d 852 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); Cruz v. Cruz, 574 So. 2d 1117 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1990). Raising children constitutes a significant contribution to the family and frees the other spouse to pursue the wage-earning f…
-
Greenberg v. Greenberg, 793 So. 2d 52 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)…y showed the husband’s 1999 earnings at $365,302. Furthermore, the husband earned only $24,000 in the first month of 2000, and the reasons given for the 1999— 2000 reduction in income were not impeached. We acknowledge that in Shudlick v. Shudlick, 618 So. 2d 740 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993), this court approved an alimony award based on an average of the husband’s income. See id. We distinguish Shudlick, however, as the facts in that case do not reflect an uncontroverted assertion that the husband’s income' had decl…
-
Brown Distrib. Co. OF W. Palm Beach v. Gale Marcel, 866 So. 2d 160 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004)…. State Dept. of Transp. v. Skidmore, 720 So. 2d 1125 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) (approving hours spent by counsel for property owner in condemnation case and noting that it was not inconsistent with hours spent by the DOT’s counsel); Shudlick v. Shudlick, 618 So. 2d 740, 741 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993) (affirming fee award to wife, noting it was not “out of line” with husband’s legal fees); Chrysler Corp. v. Weinstein, 522 So. 2d 894 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988) (affirming a finding that counsel’s hours were not excessive when compa…
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Smith v. State, 618 So. 2d 737 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993)
- Martin v. State, 618 So. 2d 737 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993)