CLIFFORD JAMES GREEN, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Leftwich v. Fla. Dep't OF Corr., 148 So. 3d 79 (Fla. 2014)
  …r statute], or has been sentenced at any time in another jurisdiction as a habitual offender....” § 944.277(l)(g), Fla. Stat. (Supp.1992) (emphasis added). The amendment was enacted as a result of the decision in Anderson. See, e.g., Mamone v. Dean, 619 So. 2d 36, 36 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993) (“After Anderson (and, indeed, because of it), the [*83] Florida Legislature remedied the language of section 944.277(l)(g), Florida Statutes, to show its clear intent that an inmate is precluded from receiving provisional cr…
• McBRIDE v. Moore, 780 So. 2d 221 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001)
  …, however, because the 1992 amendment makes it clear that the intent of the prior law was to preclude an award of provisional release credits if the defendant is sentenced as a habitual offender at any time. As the court explained in Mamone v. Dean, 619 So. 2d 36 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993), the legislature actually amended section 944.277(1)(g) as a reaction to the Anderson decision and thus “remedied the language of section 944.277(l)(g), Florida Statutes, to show its clear intent that an inmate is precluded from…
• Bennett Smith v. State, 623 So. 2d 840 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993)
  …ecial provisions page of the sentence appealed should be corrected to show Smith is to serve his minimum mandatory three year sentence pursuant to section 893.13(1)(e)(1) rather than section 893.135(1)(b), as it presently states. See Green v. State, 619 So. 2d 36 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993); Surratt v. State, 605 So. 2d 177 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992); Griffin v. State, 565 So. 2d 918 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); Heath v. State, 548 So. 2d 1183 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989); Davis v. State, 529 So. 2d 1251 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988). We remand fo…

Authorities Cited

• Leider v. State, 605 So. 2d 177 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992)